Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS Storage Pool advice

2006-12-18 Thread Richard Elling
Kory Wheatley wrote: Basically then wilth data being stored on the ZFS disks (no applications), and web servers logs, it would benefit us more to have the 3 luns setup in one ZFS Storage Pool? In general, yes. -- richard ___ zfs-discuss mailing lis

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS Storage Pool advice

2006-12-15 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Kory, Friday, December 15, 2006, 6:58:53 PM, you wrote: KW> Basically then wilth data being stored on the ZFS disks (no KW> applications), and web servers logs, it would benefit us more to KW> have the 3 luns setup in one ZFS Storage Pool? If you put all 3 LUNs in one pool just make sure t

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS Storage Pool advice

2006-12-15 Thread Anton B. Rang
Yes. Use one pool. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS Storage Pool advice

2006-12-15 Thread Kory Wheatley
Basically then wilth data being stored on the ZFS disks (no applications), and web servers logs, it would benefit us more to have the 3 luns setup in one ZFS Storage Pool? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-dis

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS Storage Pool advice

2006-12-14 Thread Kory Wheatley
Basically then wilth data being stored on the ZFS disks (no applications), and web servers logs, it would benefit us more to have the 3 luns setup in one ZFS Storage Pool? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-dis