On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:09:09PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:38:05AM -0800, Peter Eriksson wrote:
> > There is nothing in the ZFS FAQ about this. I also fail to see how FMA
> > could make any difference since it seems that ZFS is deadlocking somewhere
> > in t
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:38:05AM -0800, Peter Eriksson wrote:
> There is nothing in the ZFS FAQ about this. I also fail to see how FMA could
> make any difference since it seems that ZFS is deadlocking somewhere in the
> kernel when this happens...
>
> It works if you wrap all the physical dev
Peter Eriksson wrote:
There is nothing in the ZFS FAQ about this. I also fail to see how FMA could make any
difference since it seems that ZFS is deadlocking somewhere in the kernel when this happens...
Some people don't see a difference between "hung" and "patiently waiting."
There are failure
There is nothing in the ZFS FAQ about this. I also fail to see how FMA could
make any difference since it seems that ZFS is deadlocking somewhere in the
kernel when this happens...
It works if you wrap all the physical devices inside SVM metadevices and use
those for your
ZFS/zpool instead. Ie:
