Dale Ghent wrote:
Yeah sure it might eat into STK profits, but one will still have to
go there for redundant controllers.
Repeat after me: There is no STK. There is only Sun. 8-)
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Jan 31, 2007, at 4:26 AM, Selim Daoud wrote:
you can still do some lun masking at the HBA level (Solaris 10)
this feature is call blacklist
Oh, I'd do that but Solaris isn't the only OS that uses arrays on my
SAN, and other hosts even cross-departmental. Thus masking from the
array is
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:19:29AM -0800, Frank Cusack wrote:
On January 24, 2007 10:04:04 AM -0800 Bryan Cantrill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:46:11AM -0800, Moazam Raja wrote:
Well, he did say fairly cheap. the ST 3511 is about $18.5k. That's
about the same price
Albert Chin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:19:29AM -0800, Frank Cusack wrote:
On January 24, 2007 10:04:04 AM -0800 Bryan Cantrill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:46:11AM -0800, Moazam Raja wrote:
Well, he did say fairly cheap. the ST 3511 is about
On Jan 25, 2007, at 10:16, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Albert Chin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:19:29AM -0800, Frank Cusack wrote:
On January 24, 2007 10:04:04 AM -0800 Bryan Cantrill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:46:11AM -0800, Moazam Raja wrote:
Well, he did say
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 10:16:47AM -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Albert Chin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:19:29AM -0800, Frank Cusack wrote:
On January 24, 2007 10:04:04 AM -0800 Bryan Cantrill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:46:11AM -0800, Moazam Raja
On January 25, 2007 11:22:41 AM -0500 Jonathan Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 10:16, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Albert Chin wrote:
So there's no way to treat a 6140 as JBOD? If you wanted to use a
6140
with ZFS, and really wanted JBOD, your only choice would be a RAID 0
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 10:16 -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
So there's no way to treat a 6140 as JBOD? If you wanted to use a 6140
with ZFS, and really wanted JBOD, your only choice would be a RAID 0
config on the 6140?
Why would you want to treat a 6140 like a JBOD? (See the previous
On Jan 25, 2007, at 14:34, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 10:16 -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
So there's no way to treat a 6140 as JBOD? If you wanted to use a
6140
with ZFS, and really wanted JBOD, your only choice would be a RAID 0
config on the 6140?
Why would you want to
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 10:16 -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
So there's no way to treat a 6140 as JBOD? If you wanted to use a 6140
with ZFS, and really wanted JBOD, your only choice would be a RAID 0
config on the 6140?
Why would you want to
Hello Jonathan,
Thursday, January 25, 2007, 9:03:47 PM, you wrote:
JE On Jan 25, 2007, at 14:34, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 10:16 -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
So there's no way to treat a 6140 as JBOD? If you wanted to use a
6140
with ZFS, and really wanted JBOD, your
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 02:24:47PM -0600, Al Hopper wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 10:16 -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
So there's no way to treat a 6140 as JBOD? If you wanted to use a 6140
with ZFS, and really wanted JBOD, your only choice
On Jan 25, 2007, at 17:30, Albert Chin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 02:24:47PM -0600, Al Hopper wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 10:16 -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
So there's no way to treat a 6140 as JBOD? If you wanted to use
a 6140
with ZFS,
too much of our future roadmap, suffice it to say that one should expect
much, much more from Sun in this vein: innovative software and innovative
hardware working together to deliver world-beating systems with undeniable
economics.
Yes please. Now give me a fairly cheap (but still quality)
On Jan 24, 2007, at 09:25, Peter Eriksson wrote:
too much of our future roadmap, suffice it to say that one should
expect
much, much more from Sun in this vein: innovative software and
innovative
hardware working together to deliver world-beating systems with
undeniable
economics.
Yes
I think this will be a hard sell internally given that it would eat up their
own storagetek line.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Peter Eriksson wrote:
too much of our future roadmap, suffice it to say that one should expect
much, much more from Sun in this vein: innovative software and innovative
hardware working together to deliver world-beating systems with undeniable
economics.
Yes please. Now give me a fairly cheap
Well, he did say fairly cheap. the ST 3511 is about $18.5k. That's
about the same price for the low-end NetApp FAS250 unit.
-Moazam
On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
Peter Eriksson wrote:
too much of our future roadmap, suffice it to say that one should
expect
much, much
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:46:11AM -0800, Moazam Raja wrote:
Well, he did say fairly cheap. the ST 3511 is about $18.5k. That's
about the same price for the low-end NetApp FAS250 unit.
Note that the 3511 is being replaced with the 6140:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
Yes please. Now give me a fairly cheap (but still quality) FC-attached JBOD
utilizing SATA/SAS disks and I'll be really happy! :-)
Could you outline why FC attached instead of network attached (iSCSI say)
makes more sense to you? It might help
On 1/24/07, Jonathan Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 24, 2007, at 09:25, Peter Eriksson wrote:
too much of our future roadmap, suffice it to say that one should
expect
much, much more from Sun in this vein: innovative software and
innovative
hardware working together to deliver
On January 24, 2007 9:40:41 AM -0800 Richard Elling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Eriksson wrote:
Yes please. Now give me a fairly cheap (but still quality) FC-attached
JBOD utilizing SATA/SAS disks and I'll be really happy! :-)
... with write cache and dual redundant controllers? I think
On January 24, 2007 10:02:52 AM -0800 Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dunno about FC or iSCSI, but what I'd really like to see is a 1U direct
attach 8-drive SAS JBOD, as described (back in May 2006!) here:
On 24 Jan 2007, at 13:04, Bryan Cantrill wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:46:11AM -0800, Moazam Raja wrote:
Well, he did say fairly cheap. the ST 3511 is about $18.5k. That's
about the same price for the low-end NetApp FAS250 unit.
Note that the 3511 is being replaced with the 6140:
Frank Cusack wrote:
On January 24, 2007 9:40:41 AM -0800 Richard Elling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Eriksson wrote:
Yes please. Now give me a fairly cheap (but still quality) FC-attached
JBOD utilizing SATA/SAS disks and I'll be really happy! :-)
... with write cache and dual redundant
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Shannon Roddy wrote:
Sun is missing out on lots of lower end storage, but perhaps that is by
design. I am a small shop by many standards, but I would have spent
tens of thousands over the last few years with Sun if they had
reasonably priced storage. shrug I just need
Ben Gollmer wrote:
On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Shannon Roddy wrote:
I went with a third party FC/SATA unit which has been flawless as
a direct attach for my ZFS JBOD system. Paid about $0.70/GB.
What did you use, if you don't mind my asking?
Arena Janus 6641. Turns out I
27 matches
Mail list logo
