how is the performance on the zfs directly without nfs?
i have experienced big problems running nfs on large volumes (independent on
the underlaying fs)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Dnia 8-11-2007 o godz. 7:58 Walter Faleiro napisał(a):
Hi Lukasz,
The output of the first sript gives
bash-3.00# ./test.sh
dtrace: script './test.sh' matched 4 probes
CPU
ID
FUNCTION:NAME
0
42681
:tick-10s
0
42681
:tick-10s
0
42681
:tick-10s
0
42681
:tick-10s
0
42681
:tick-10s
Hi Lukasz,
The output of the first sript gives
bash-3.00# ./test.sh
dtrace: script './test.sh' matched 4 probes
CPU IDFUNCTION:NAME
0 42681:tick-10s
0 42681:tick-10s
0 42681:tick-10s
0
Hi,
We have a zfs file system configured using a Sunfire 280R with a 10T
Raidweb array
bash-3.00# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
filer 9.44T 6.97T 2.47T73% ONLINE -
bash-3.00# zpool status
pool: backup
