[zfs-discuss] Solaris 10 ZFS Update

2006-07-31 Thread George Wilson
We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from 
OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's 
the list:


Features:
PSARC 2006/223 ZFS Hot Spares
6405966 Hot Spare support in ZFS
PSARC 2006/303 ZFS Clone Promotion
6276916 support for clone swap
PSARC 2006/388 snapshot -r
6373978 want to take lots of snapshots quickly ('zfs snapshot -r')

Bug Fixes:
4034947 anon_swap_adjust() should call kmem_reap() if availrmem is low.
6288488 du reports misleading size on RAID-Z
6366301 CREATE with owner_group attribute is not set correctly with 
NFSv4/ZFS

6385436 zfs set  returns an error, but still sets property value
6393490 libzfs should be a real library
6397148 fbufs debug code should be removed from buf_hash_insert()
6401400 zfs(1) usage output is excessively long
6409228 typo in aclutils.h
6409302 passing a non-root vdev via zpool_create() panics system
6415739 assertion failed: !(zio-io_flags  0x00040)
6416482 filebench oltp workload hangs in zfs
6416759 ::dbufs does not find bonus buffers anymore
6416794 zfs panics in dnode_reallocate during incremental zfs restore
6417978 double parity RAID-Z a.k.a. RAID6
6421216 ufsrestore should use acl_set() for setting ACLs
6424554 full block re-writes need not read data in
6425111 detaching an offline device can result in import confusion
6425740 assertion failed: new_state != old_state
6430121 3-way deadlock involving tc_lock within zfs
6433264 crash when adding spare: nvlist_lookup_string(cnv, path, 
path) == 0

6433406 zfs_open() can leak memory on failure
6433408 namespace_reload() can leak memory on allocation failure
6433679 zpool_refresh_stats() has poor error semantics
6433680 changelist_gather() ignores libuutil errors
6433717 offline devices should not be marked persistently unavailble
6435779 6433679 broke zpool import
6436524 importing a bogus pool config can panic system
6436526 delete_queue thread reporting drained when it may not be true
6436800 ztest failure: spa_vdev_attach() returns EBUSY instead of ENOTSUP
6439102 assertain failed: dmu_buf_refcount(dd-dd_dbuf) == 2 in 
dsl_dir_destroy_check()

6439370 assertion failures possible in dsl_dataset_destroy_sync()
6440499 zil should avoid txg_wait_synced() and use dmu_sync() to issue 
parallel IOs when fsyncing

6444346 zfs promote fails in zone
6446569 deferred list is hooked on flintstone vitamins
6447377 ZFS prefetch is inconsistant
6447452 re-creating zfs files can lead to failure to unmount
6448371 'zfs promote' of a volume clone fails with EBUSY
6450292 unmount original file system, 'zfs promote' cause system panic.
6451124 assertion failed: rc-rc_count = number
6451412 renaming snapshot with 'mv' makes unmounting snapshot impossible

Thanks,
George
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris 10 ZFS Update

2006-07-31 Thread Rainer Orth
George Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from 
 OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's 
 the list:

That's great news, thanks.

 Bug Fixes:

I notice this one

6405330 swap on zvol isn't added during boot

is missing.  Any chance to get this in?  Do I need an escalation for that,
or is it waiting to go in with ZFS boot in U4 only?

Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris 10 ZFS Update

2006-07-31 Thread George Wilson

Rainer,

This will hopefully go into build 06 of s10u3. It's on my list... :-)

Thanks,
George

Rainer Orth wrote:

George Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from 
OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's 
the list:


That's great news, thanks.


Bug Fixes:


I notice this one

6405330 swap on zvol isn't added during boot

is missing.  Any chance to get this in?  Do I need an escalation for that,
or is it waiting to go in with ZFS boot in U4 only?

Rainer


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris 10 ZFS Update

2006-07-31 Thread George Wilson

I forgot to highlight that RAIDZ2 (a.k.a RAID-6) is also in this wad:

6417978 double parity RAID-Z a.k.a. RAID6

Thanks,
George

George Wilson wrote:
We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from 
OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's 
the list:


Features:
PSARC 2006/223 ZFS Hot Spares
6405966 Hot Spare support in ZFS
PSARC 2006/303 ZFS Clone Promotion
6276916 support for clone swap
PSARC 2006/388 snapshot -r
6373978 want to take lots of snapshots quickly ('zfs snapshot -r')

Bug Fixes:
4034947 anon_swap_adjust() should call kmem_reap() if availrmem is low.
6288488 du reports misleading size on RAID-Z
6366301 CREATE with owner_group attribute is not set correctly with 
NFSv4/ZFS

6385436 zfs set  returns an error, but still sets property value
6393490 libzfs should be a real library
6397148 fbufs debug code should be removed from buf_hash_insert()
6401400 zfs(1) usage output is excessively long
6409228 typo in aclutils.h
6409302 passing a non-root vdev via zpool_create() panics system
6415739 assertion failed: !(zio-io_flags  0x00040)
6416482 filebench oltp workload hangs in zfs
6416759 ::dbufs does not find bonus buffers anymore
6416794 zfs panics in dnode_reallocate during incremental zfs restore
6417978 double parity RAID-Z a.k.a. RAID6
6421216 ufsrestore should use acl_set() for setting ACLs
6424554 full block re-writes need not read data in
6425111 detaching an offline device can result in import confusion
6425740 assertion failed: new_state != old_state
6430121 3-way deadlock involving tc_lock within zfs
6433264 crash when adding spare: nvlist_lookup_string(cnv, path, 
path) == 0

6433406 zfs_open() can leak memory on failure
6433408 namespace_reload() can leak memory on allocation failure
6433679 zpool_refresh_stats() has poor error semantics
6433680 changelist_gather() ignores libuutil errors
6433717 offline devices should not be marked persistently unavailble
6435779 6433679 broke zpool import
6436524 importing a bogus pool config can panic system
6436526 delete_queue thread reporting drained when it may not be true
6436800 ztest failure: spa_vdev_attach() returns EBUSY instead of ENOTSUP
6439102 assertain failed: dmu_buf_refcount(dd-dd_dbuf) == 2 in 
dsl_dir_destroy_check()

6439370 assertion failures possible in dsl_dataset_destroy_sync()
6440499 zil should avoid txg_wait_synced() and use dmu_sync() to issue 
parallel IOs when fsyncing

6444346 zfs promote fails in zone
6446569 deferred list is hooked on flintstone vitamins
6447377 ZFS prefetch is inconsistant
6447452 re-creating zfs files can lead to failure to unmount
6448371 'zfs promote' of a volume clone fails with EBUSY
6450292 unmount original file system, 'zfs promote' cause system panic.
6451124 assertion failed: rc-rc_count = number
6451412 renaming snapshot with 'mv' makes unmounting snapshot impossible

Thanks,
George
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris 10 ZFS Update

2006-07-31 Thread grant beattie
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:51:09AM -0400, George Wilson wrote:

 We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from 
 OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's 
 the list:

George,

this is great! any idea when these will be available as patches for
s10u2? I imagine they are very desirable for Thumper.

grant.

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris 10 ZFS Update

2006-07-31 Thread George Wilson

Grant,

Expect patches late September or so. Once available I'll post the patch 
information.


Thanks,
George

grant beattie wrote:

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:51:09AM -0400, George Wilson wrote:

We have putback a significant number of fixes and features from 
OpenSolaris into what will become Solaris 10 11/06. For reference here's 
the list:


George,

this is great! any idea when these will be available as patches for
s10u2? I imagine they are very desirable for Thumper.

grant.


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss