Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS layout recommendations

2007-11-27 Thread Tommy McNeely
The question is, if you *temporarily* migrate your zones to UFS to install the big bad S10u4 patch, and migrate back to ZFS afterwards, will patches work after that? A better way to say that is, have we resolved this patch problem with zoneroot on zfs for S10u4? Tommy This message posted fr

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS layout recommendations

2007-11-26 Thread Marion Hakanson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > That link specifically mentions "new Solaris 10 release", so I am assuming > that means going from like u4 to Sol 10 u5, and that shouldn't cause a > problem when doing plain patchadd's (w/o live upgrade). If so, then I am fine > with those warnings and can use zfs with zo

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS layout recommendations

2007-11-21 Thread James C. McPherson
Ian Collins wrote: > James C. McPherson wrote: >> Ian Collins wrote: >> ... >>> I don't know if anything else breaks when you do this, but if you are >>> building software in a zone on a lofs filesystem, dmake hangs. Regular >>> make works fine. >>> >>> The output from truss is: >>> >>> stat64("/e

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS layout recommendations

2007-11-21 Thread Ian Collins
James C. McPherson wrote: > Ian Collins wrote: > ... >> I don't know if anything else breaks when you do this, but if you are >> building software in a zone on a lofs filesystem, dmake hangs. Regular >> make works fine. >> >> The output from truss is: >> >> stat64("/export/home", 0x08045B60) = 0 >

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS layout recommendations

2007-11-21 Thread James C. McPherson
Ian Collins wrote: ... > I don't know if anything else breaks when you do this, but if you are > building software in a zone on a lofs filesystem, dmake hangs. Regular > make works fine. > > The output from truss is: > > stat64("/export/home", 0x08045B60) = 0 > llseek(8, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 0 > llsee

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS layout recommendations

2007-11-21 Thread Ian Collins
James C. McPherson wrote: > Anil Jangity wrote: > >> I have pool called "data". >> >> I have zones configured in that pool. The zonepath is: /data/zone1/fs. >> (/data/zone1 itself is not used for anything else, by anyone, and has no >> other data.) There are no datasets being delegated to this z

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS layout recommendations

2007-11-21 Thread Anil Jangity
Thanks James/John! That link specifically mentions "new Solaris 10 release", so I am assuming that means going from like u4 to Sol 10 u5, and that shouldn't cause a problem when doing plain patchadd's (w/o live upgrade). If so, then I am fine with those warnings and can use zfs with zones' path

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS layout recommendations

2007-11-21 Thread John Wren Kennedy
Anil Jangity wrote: > I have pool called "data". > > I have zones configured in that pool. The zonepath is: /data/zone1/fs. > (/data/zone1 itself is not used for anything else, by anyone, and has no > other data.) There are no datasets being delegated to this zone. > > I want to create a snapsh

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS layout recommendations

2007-11-21 Thread James C. McPherson
Anil Jangity wrote: > I have pool called "data". > > I have zones configured in that pool. The zonepath is: /data/zone1/fs. > (/data/zone1 itself is not used for anything else, by anyone, and has no > other data.) There are no datasets being delegated to this zone. > > I want to create a snapshot

[zfs-discuss] ZFS layout recommendations

2007-11-21 Thread Anil Jangity
I have pool called "data". I have zones configured in that pool. The zonepath is: /data/zone1/fs. (/data/zone1 itself is not used for anything else, by anyone, and has no other data.) There are no datasets being delegated to this zone. I want to create a snapshot that I would want to make avail