On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 23:40 -0600, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
> You had a file system on top of the mirror and there was some I/O
> occurring to the mirror. The *only* time, SVM puts a device into
> maintenance is when we receive an EIO from the underlying device. So,
> in case a write occurred t
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:40:53PM -0600, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
> Since it's not exactly clear what you did with SVM I am assuming the
> following:
>
> You had a file system on top of the mirror and there was some I/O
> occurring to the mirror. The *only* time, SVM puts a device into
> maint
Since it's not exactly clear what you did with SVM I am assuming the
following:
You had a file system on top of the mirror and there was some I/O
occurring to the mirror. The *only* time, SVM puts a device into
maintenance is when we receive an EIO from the underlying device. So,
in case
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 10:32 -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:22:34AM +1000, grant beattie wrote:
> >
> > what I find interesting is that the SCSI errors were continuous for 10
> > minutes before I detached it, ZFS wasn't backing off at all. it was
> > flooding the VGA consol
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:22:34AM +1000, grant beattie wrote:
>
> what I find interesting is that the SCSI errors were continuous for 10
> minutes before I detached it, ZFS wasn't backing off at all. it was
> flooding the VGA console quicker than the console could print it all
> :) from what you
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:13:46AM -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
> What has happened is that your device has started reporting errors, but
> is still available on the system. i.e. ZFS is still able to ldi_open()
> the underlying device. This seems like a strange failure mode for the
> device (you m
What has happened is that your device has started reporting errors, but
is still available on the system. i.e. ZFS is still able to ldi_open()
the underlying device. This seems like a strange failure mode for the
device (you may want to investigate how that's possible), but ZFS is
functioning as
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:02:37PM +1000, grant beattie wrote:
> running b37 on amd64. after removing power from a disk configured as
> a mirror, 10 minutes has passed and ZFS has still not offlined it.
I should have mentioned, the disks are connected to an Adaptec 2120S
card (aac). not that I th
running b37 on amd64. after removing power from a disk configured as
a mirror, 10 minutes has passed and ZFS has still not offlined it.
# zpool status tank
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
attempt was made to correct the er
