I've had people mention that WAFL does indeed support clones of snapshots.
Is this a what version of WAFL problem?
Darren
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi,
I m sure some of you may have heard this already
' ZFS is a reverse engineered WAFL'
from NetApp guys. If not, you will soon...
Has anyone put together a white paper or a
presentation or some bullet points positioning ZFS vs
WAFL.
S10 and ZFS is opensource is great but If there is
some
On 7/27/06, Praveen Mogili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I m sure some of you may have heard this already
' ZFS is a reverse engineered WAFL'
from NetApp guys. If not, you will soon...
Has anyone put together a white paper or a
presentation or some bullet points positioning ZFS vs
WAFL.
S10
From a RAS perspective, ZFS's end-to-end data integrity feature is critical.
If the competing file system doesn't have this capability, then they can't play
in this sandbox.
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
one more time with the attachment
I wouldn't say that either system had Raid-5. Both raid-4 and raid-z
have significant differences in how they work from raid-5.
Netapp certainly has quotas, but they're not as flexible as ZFS.
Can you explain more what you mean by 'Raw device' and 'volume
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:17:47AM -0700, Praveen Mogili wrote:
S10 and ZFS is opensource is great but If there is
some solid material with technical detailsI would
really appreciate it.
The ZFS on-disk file format is here:
On 7/27/06, Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one more time with the attachment
I wouldn't say that either system had Raid-5. Both raid-4 and raid-z
have significant differences in how they work from raid-5.
Netapp certainly has quotas, but they're not as flexible as ZFS.
Can you
