On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:49:15 -0800, Frank Cusack
fcus...@fcusack.com wrote:
zfs set only seems to accept an absolute path, which even if you set it
to the name of the pool, isn't quite the same thing as the default.
see my other thread about set mountpoint but don't mount?.
That property is
On January 31, 2009 10:57:11 AM +0100 Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:49:15 -0800, Frank Cusack
fcus...@fcusack.com wrote:
zfs set only seems to accept an absolute path, which even if you set it
to the name of the pool, isn't quite the same thing as the default.
see
To set the mountpoint back to default, use 'zfs inherit mountpoint dataset'
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:49:09 -0800, Frank Cusack
fcus...@fcusack.com wrote:
On January 31, 2009 10:57:11 AM +0100 Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:49:15 -0800, Frank Cusack
fcus...@fcusack.com wrote:
zfs set only seems to accept an absolute path, which even if you set
On January 31, 2009 10:17:56 AM -0800 Mark J Musante mark.musa...@sun.com
wrote:
To set the mountpoint back to default, use 'zfs inherit mountpoint
dataset'
oh, duh smacks head. i realized that was the case for all but the
top level dataset but didn't intuit that at the top level inherit
zfs set only seems to accept an absolute path, which even if you set it
to the name of the pool, isn't quite the same thing as the default.
see my other thread about set mountpoint but don't mount?.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
