Re: [zfs-discuss] long time to schedule commands

2006-07-11 Thread eric kustarz
Sean Meighan wrote: i made sure path is clean, i also qualified the paths. time varies from 0.5 seconds to 15 seconds. If i just do a "timex pwd", it always seems to be fast. We are using csh. Here's a simple dscript to figure out how long each syscall is taking: #!/usr/sbin/dtrace -FCs s

Re: [zfs-discuss] long time to schedule commands

2006-07-11 Thread Sean Meighan
i made sure path is clean, i also qualified the paths. time varies from 0.5 seconds to 15 seconds. If i just do a "timex pwd", it always seems to be fast. We are using csh. itsm-mpk-2% env HOME=/app/canary PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin LOGNAME=canary HZ=100 TERM=xterm TZ=US/Pacific SH

Re: [zfs-discuss] long time to schedule commands

2006-07-11 Thread Dana H. Myers
Richard Elling wrote: > Michael Schuster - Sun Microsystems wrote: >> Sean Meighan wrote: >>> I am not sure if this is ZFS, Niagara or something else issue? Does >>> someone know why commands have the latency shown below? >>> >>> *1) do a ls of a directory. 6.9 seconds total, truss only shows .07

Re: [zfs-discuss] long time to schedule commands

2006-07-11 Thread Richard Elling
Michael Schuster - Sun Microsystems wrote: Sean Meighan wrote: I am not sure if this is ZFS, Niagara or something else issue? Does someone know why commands have the latency shown below? *1) do a ls of a directory. 6.9 seconds total, truss only shows .07 seconds.* [...] this may be an is

Re: [zfs-discuss] long time to schedule commands

2006-07-11 Thread Michael Schuster - Sun Microsystems
Sean Meighan wrote: I am not sure if this is ZFS, Niagara or something else issue? Does someone know why commands have the latency shown below? *1) do a ls of a directory. 6.9 seconds total, truss only shows .07 seconds.* [...] this may be an issue with your $PATH. Do you see the same beh