Hey Peter,
If I recall correctly, the result was there was a very slight space-efficiency
benefit of using a multiple of 2 vdevs for raidz1 and of 3 vdevs for raidz2 --
doing this can reduce the number of 'skipped' blocks. That said, the advantage
is very slight and is only really relevant when
Hi Peter,
Peter Tribble wrote:
I'm being a bit of a dunderhead at the moment and neither the site
search nor google are picking up the information I seek...
There was the thread named Metaslab alignment on RAID-Z on this list,
you may want to look at it.
I'm setting up a thumper and I'm
I'm being a bit of a dunderhead at the moment and neither the site search
nor
google are picking up the information I seek...
I'm setting up a thumper and I'm sure I recall some discussion of the
optimal
number of drives in raidz1 and raidz2 vdevs. I also recall that it was
something
like you
