Re: [zfs-discuss] sharenfs with over 10000 file systems

2008-01-31 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Ahrens wrote: | I believe this is because sharemgr does an O(number of shares) operation | whenever you try to share/unshare anything (retrieving the list of shares | from the kernel to make sure that it isn't/is already shared). I couldn't |

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharenfs with over 10000 file systems

2008-01-28 Thread Chris
I too am having the same issues. I started out using Solaris 10 8/07 release. I could create all the filesystems, 47,000 filesystems, but if you needed to reboot, patch, shutdown Very bad. So then I read about sharemgr and how it was supposed to mitigate these issues. Well, after

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharenfs with over 10000 file systems

2008-01-28 Thread Alok Aggarwal
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Chris wrote: I did a little bit more digging and found some interesting things. NFS4 Mirror mounts. This would seem to be the most logical option. In this scenario the client would connect to a single mount /tank/users but would be able to move through the

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharenfs with over 10000 file systems

2008-01-25 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
New, yes. Aware - probably not. Given cheap filesystems, users would create many filesystems was an easy guess, but I somehow don't think anybody envisioned that users would be creating tens of thousands of filesystems. ZFS - too good for it's own good :-p IMO (and given mails/posts

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharenfs with over 10000 file systems

2008-01-24 Thread Akhilesh Mritunjai
New, yes. Aware - probably not. Given cheap filesystems, users would create many filesystems was an easy guess, but I somehow don't think anybody envisioned that users would be creating tens of thousands of filesystems. ZFS - too good for it's own good :-p This message posted from

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharenfs with over 10000 file systems

2008-01-23 Thread Akhilesh Mritunjai
I remember reading a discussion where these kind of problems were discussed. Basically it boils down to everything not being aware of the radical changes in filesystems concept. All these things are being worked on, but it might take sometime before everything is made aware that yes it's no

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharenfs with over 10000 file systems

2008-01-23 Thread Albert Chin
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 08:02:22AM -0800, Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote: I remember reading a discussion where these kind of problems were discussed. Basically it boils down to everything not being aware of the radical changes in filesystems concept. All these things are being worked on, but

[zfs-discuss] sharenfs with over 10000 file systems

2008-01-18 Thread zfsmonk
Anyone out there using sharenfs=on with a large amount of filesystems? We have over 1 filesystems all in one pool. Everything is great until we turn on sharenfs (zfs set sharenfs=on poolName). Once that is enabled, zfs create poolName/filesystem takes about 5 minutes to complete. If nfs