[zfs-discuss] tagged ACL groups: let's just keep digging until we come out the other side (was: zfs proerty aclmode gone in 147?)

2010-09-29 Thread Miles Nordin
rb == Ralph Böhme ra...@rsrc.de writes: rb The Darwin kernel evaluates permissions in a first rb match paradigm, evaluating the ACL before the mode well...I think it would be better to AND them together like AFS did. In that case it doesn't make any difference in which order you do it

Re: [zfs-discuss] tagged ACL groups: let's just keep digging until we come out the other side (was: zfs proerty aclmode gone in 147?)

2010-09-29 Thread Nicolas Williams
Keep in mind that Windows lacks a mode_t. We need to interop with Windows. If a Windows user cannot completely change file perms because there's a mode_t completely out of their reach... they'll be frustrated. Thus an ACL-and-mode model where both are applied doesn't work. It'd be nice, but it

Re: [zfs-discuss] tagged ACL groups: let's just keep digging until we come out the other side (was: zfs proerty aclmode gone in 147?)

2010-09-29 Thread Ralph Böhme
Keep in mind that Windows lacks a mode_t. We need to interop with Windows. Oh my, I see. Another itch to scratch. Now at least Windows users are happy while me and mabye others are not. -r -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] tagged ACL groups: let's just keep digging until we come out the other side (was: zfs proerty aclmode gone in 147?)

2010-09-29 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:09:22PM -0700, Ralph Böhme wrote: Keep in mind that Windows lacks a mode_t. We need to interop with Windows. Oh my, I see. Another itch to scratch. Now at least Windows users are happy while me and mabye others are not. Yes. Pardon me for forgetting to mention

Re: [zfs-discuss] tagged ACL groups: let's just keep digging until we come out the other side (was: zfs proerty aclmode gone in 147?)

2010-09-29 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 05:21:51PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:09:22PM -0700, Ralph Böhme wrote: Keep in mind that Windows lacks a mode_t. We need to interop with Windows. Oh my, I see. Another itch to scratch. Now at least Windows users are happy while