Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool detach on non-mirrored drive

2008-12-22 Thread Joel Cesar
I have only one question: why? ZFS is a great filesystem, but, why we can't shrink a zpool? This is a very important feature to ZFS adoption in enterprises, or not? Is it at least a planned feature? Thanks, Joel On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Daniel ne...@hotmail.com wrote: Cindy, This is

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool detach on non-mirrored drive

2008-12-22 Thread Ross
Actually, I think it's smaller companies and home users who want this most. Sun target enterprises with their storage kit which tends to be servers that are fully populated with drives. Look at the thumper for example - a 4U server that already comes with 48 drives. You're not going to be

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool detach on non-mirrored drive

2008-12-18 Thread Daniel
Is it possible to do a replace on the root filesystem as well? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool detach on non-mirrored drive

2008-12-18 Thread Daniel
Is it possible to do a replace on / as well? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool detach on non-mirrored drive

2008-12-18 Thread Cindy . Swearingen
Daniel, You can replace the disks in both of the supported root pool configurations: - single disk (non-redundant) root pool - mirrored (redundant) root pool I've tried both recently and I prefer attaching the replacement disk to the single-disk root pool and then detaching the old disk, using

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool detach on non-mirrored drive

2008-12-18 Thread Daniel
Cindy, This is helpful! Thank you very much :) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool detach on non-mirrored drive

2008-12-17 Thread Ross
Err... you can't remove drives that are in use, but for what you're describing can't you just use zfs replace and then remove the old drive? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool detach on non-mirrored drive

2008-12-17 Thread Daniel
It is unfortunately that you ask this question after you've installed the new disks; now both the old and the new disks are part of the same zpool. That's awesome, I did not know that this would work. I'm glad I made this post. I actually have not yet replaced any drive, in fact, this very

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool detach on non-mirrored drive

2008-12-16 Thread Tim
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Daniel ne...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm using zfs not to have access to a fail-safe backed up system, but to easily manage my file system. I would like to be able to, as I buy new harddrives, just to be able to replace the old ones. I'm very environmentally

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool detach on non-mirrored drive

2008-12-16 Thread Daniel
tcook, Thanks for your response. Well, I don't imagine there would be a lot of requests from enterprise customers with deep pockets. My impression has been that OS is targetting the little guy though, and as such, this would really be a welcome feature. -- This message posted from