Hi all,
I'm running FreeNAS 7 (based on FreeBSD 7.2) and using ZFS v.13. I had two 2TB
drives and one 1TB drive in a raidz1. I recently bought another 2TB drive to
replace the 1TB drive. Unfortunately, I ran into some serious issues which are
described in the steps that I did below:
First, I
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Tyler Benster wrote:
It seems quite likely that all of the data is intact, and that something
different is preventing me from accessing the pool. What can I do to
recover the pool? I have downloaded the Solaris 11 express livecd if
that would be of any use.
Try running
On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Hi all
It seems recent WD drives that aren't Raid edition can cause rather a lot
of problems on RAID systems. We have a few machines with LSI controllers
(6801/6081/9201) and we're seeing massive errors occuring. The usual pattern
http://wdc.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/1397/~/difference-between-desktop-edition-and-raid-%28enterprise%29-edition-drives
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Just curious if anyone has looked into the relationship between zpool
dedupe, zfs zend dedupe, memory use, and network throughput.
For example, does 'zfs send -D' use the same DDT as the pool? Or does it
require more memory for it's own DDT, thus impacting performance of both?
If you have a
On Sep 6, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
Just curious if anyone has looked into the relationship between zpool dedupe,
zfs zend dedupe, memory use, and network throughput.
Yes.
For example, does 'zfs send -D' use the same DDT as the pool?
No.
Or does it require more memory for
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:05:54PM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
On Sep 6, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
For example, does 'zfs send -D' use the same DDT as the pool?
No.
My understanding was that 'zfs send -D' would use the pool's DDT in
building its own, if present. If blocks
