LOL. Well, for what it's worth, there are three common pronunciations for
btrfs. Butterfs, Betterfs, and B-Tree FS (because it's based on b-trees.)
Check wikipedia. (This isn't really true, but I like to joke, after
saying something like that, I wrote the wikipedia page just now.) ;-)
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:08:04AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:15:31AM -0500, David Magda wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 00:55, Richard Elling wrote:
Better than ?
If the disks advertise 512 bytes, the only
On 11/13/2011 05:18 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
LOL. Well, for what it's worth, there are three common pronunciations for
btrfs. Butterfs, Betterfs, and B-Tree FS (because it's based on b-trees.)
Check wikipedia. (This isn't really true, but I like to joke, after
saying something like that, I
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Liu
Why not give some tolerance to Btrfs? You can kindly drop an email to
its mail list for any issue you are not satisfied with.
Satirize or lampoon does not make sense to any open
tip below…
On Nov 13, 2011, at 3:24 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:08:04AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:15:31AM -0500, David Magda wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 00:55, Richard Elling wrote:
