Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-11-10 Thread Trond Michelsen
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:42 PM, LIC mesh wrote: > The new drive I bought correctly identifies as 4096 byte blocksize! > So...OI doesn't like it merging with the existing pool. So... Any solution to this yet? I've got a 42 drive zpool (21 mirror vdevs) with 12 2TB drives that has 512byte blocksi

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-11-10 Thread Jan Owoc
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen wrote: > When I try to replace the old drive, I get this error: > > # zpool replace tank c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 c4t5000C5004DE863F2d0 > cannot replace c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 with c4t5000C5004DE863F2d0: > devices have different sector alignment > > > H

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-11-10 Thread Jan Owoc
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Jan Owoc wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen wrote: >> When I try to replace the old drive, I get this error: >> >> # zpool replace tank c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 c4t5000C5004DE863F2d0 >> cannot replace c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 with c4t5000C5004DE86

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-11-10 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jan Owoc wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen > wrote: > > When I try to replace the old drive, I get this error: > > > > # zpool replace tank c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 c4t5000C5004DE863F2d0 > > cannot replace c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 with c4t5000C5

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-11-10 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Jan Owoc wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Jan Owoc wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen > wrote: > >> When I try to replace the old drive, I get this error: > >> > >> # zpool replace tank c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 c4t5000C5004DE863F2d

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-11-10 Thread Jan Owoc
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Tim Cook wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Jan Owoc wrote: >> Sorry... my question was partly answered by Jim Klimov on this list: >> http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2012-June/008546.html >> >> Apparently the currently-suggested way (a

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot replace X with Y: devices have different sector alignment

2012-11-10 Thread Jim Klimov
On 2012-11-10 17:16, Jan Owoc wrote: Any other ideas short of block pointer rewrite? A few... one is an idea of what could be the cause: AFAIK the ashift value is not so much per-pool as per-toplevel-vdev. If the pool started as a set of the 512b drives and was then expanded to include sets of

[zfs-discuss] (Meta)Data corrupted on multiple triple mirrors

2012-11-10 Thread Tomas Forsman
Hello. 3 month old pool hosted across two SAS JBODs w/ SATA disks on an x4170m2 running Solaris 11 SRU6.6, ran a scrub and I got this: pool: zdata state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Res