Le 30/11/2012 ? 15:52:09+0100, Tomas Forsman a écrit
On 30 November, 2012 - Albert Shih sent me these 0,8K bytes:
Hi all,
I would like to knwon if with ZFS it's possible to do something like that :
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/removeadisk.html
meaning :
I have a
Hi Albert,
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Albert Shih albert.s...@obspm.fr wrote:
Le 30/11/2012 ? 15:52:09+0100, Tomas Forsman a écrit
On 30 November, 2012 - Albert Shih sent me these 0,8K bytes:
I would like to knwon if with ZFS it's possible to do something like that :
If you are attaching a new enclosure, make a new zpool in that enclosure with a
temporary name and 'zfs send' snapshots from the old pool to the new pool,
reading in with 'zfs recv'.
Craig Cory
Senior Instructor
ExitCertified.com
On Dec 1, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Albert Shih albert.s...@obspm.fr
Hello,
Im about to migrate a 6Tb database from Veritas Volume Manager to ZFS, I
want to set arc_max parameter so ZFS cant use all my system's memory, but i
dont know how much i should set, do you think 24Gb will be enough for a 6Tb
database? obviously the more the better but i cant set too much
On 2012-12-01 15:05, Fung Zheng wrote:
Hello,
Im about to migrate a 6Tb database from Veritas Volume Manager to ZFS, I
want to set arc_max parameter so ZFS cant use all my system's memory,
but i dont know how much i should set, do you think 24Gb will be enough
for a 6Tb database? obviously the
Hello,
Thanks for you reply, i forgot to mention that the doc Configuring ZFS for
an Oracle Database was followed, this include primarycache, logbias,
recordsize properties, all the best practices was followed and my only
doubt is the arc_max parameter, i want to know if 24Gb is good enough for a
On 11/29/12 10:56 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
For example, I might want to have corporate webshop-related
databases and appservers to be the fastest storage citizens,
then some corporate CRM and email, then various lower priority
zones and VMs, and at the bottom of the list - backups.
AFAIK, now such
On 12/ 2/12 03:24 AM, Nikola M. wrote:
It is using Solaris Zones and throttling their disk usage on that level,
so you separate workload processes on separate zones.
Or even put KVM machines under the zones (Joyent and OI support
Joyent-written KVM/Intel implementation in Illumos) for the same
On Dec 1, 2012, at 6:54 PM, Nikola M. minik...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/ 2/12 03:24 AM, Nikola M. wrote:
It is using Solaris Zones and throttling their disk usage on that level,
so you separate workload processes on separate zones.
Or even put KVM machines under the zones (Joyent and OI support
My problematic home-NAS (that old list readers might still remember
about from a year-two ago) is back online, thanks to a friend who
fixed and turned it on. I'm going to try some more research on that
failure I had with the 6-disk raidz2 set, when it suddenly couldn't
read and recover some
On 12/ 2/12 05:19 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Dec 1, 2012, at 6:54 PM, Nikola M. minik...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/ 2/12 03:24 AM, Nikola M. wrote:
It is using Solaris Zones and throttling their disk usage on that level,
so you separate workload processes on separate zones.
Or even put KVM
11 matches
Mail list logo
