ly enough.
It seems the technology is finished, unless a credible fork is
forthcoming.
--
Alan Hargreaves | Principal Technical Support Engineer
Solaris and Networking | Global Systems Support
Email: alan.hargrea...@oracle.com
Blog: alanhargreaves.wor
Title: signature
You do it as you would any zpool. Mirroring is OK for the zpool.
It's just things like raidz* and concats that are not.
# zpool attach rpool device
Note the use of attach. "add" will try to make a concat.
Regards,
Title: signature
There is a ZFS Community on the Oracle Communities that was just
kicked off this month -
https://communities.oracle.com/portal/server.pt/community/oracle_solaris_zfs_file_system/526
Regards,
Alan Hargreaves
On 06/12/12 08:05, Tomas
they don't benchmark the operations that are
critical to business. Sure we can spend a lot of time examining the
issue and then addressing it; but would it actually help address a real
business concern, or just an "itch"?
Regards,
Alan Hargreaves
Paisit Wongsongsarn wrote:
Hi
ped. The dereference looks like the first
dereference in page_unlock(), which looks at pp->p_selock.
I can spend a little time looking at it, but was wondering if anyone had
seen this kind of panic previously?
I have two identical crashdumps created in exactly the same way.
alan.
--
I know, bad form replying to myself, but I am wondering if it might be
related to
6438702 error handling in zfs_getpage() can trigger "page not
locked"
Which is marked "fix in progress" with a target of the current build.
alan.
Alan Hargreaves wrote:
Folks, be
