Re: [zfs-discuss] Setting up an SSD ZIL - Need A Reality Check

2009-10-21 Thread Meilicke, Scott
Thank you Bob and Richard. I will go with A, as it also keeps things simple. One physical device per pool. -Scott On 10/20/09 6:46 PM, Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Richard Elling wrote: The ZIL device will never require more space than RAM. In

Re: [zfs-discuss] Setting up an SSD ZIL - Need A Reality Check

2009-10-21 Thread Meilicke, Scott
Thanks Ed. It sounds like you have run in this mode? No issues with the perc? -- Scott Meilicke On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:59 PM, Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com wrote: System: Dell 2950 16G RAM 16 1.5T SATA disks in a SAS chassis hanging off of an LSI 3801e, no extra drive slots, a

Re: [zfs-discuss] Setting up an SSD ZIL - Need A Reality Check

2009-10-22 Thread Meilicke, Scott
Interesting. We must have different setups with our PERCs. Mine have always auto rebuilt. -- Scott Meilicke On Oct 22, 2009, at 6:14 AM, Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com wrote: Replacing failed disks is easy when PERC is doing the RAID. Just remove the failed drive and replace

Re: [zfs-discuss] Kernel panic on ZFS import - how do I recover?

2010-09-28 Thread Meilicke, Scott
Brilliant. I set those parameters via /etc/system, rebooted, and the pool imported with just the ­f switch. I had seen this as an option earlier, although not that thread, but was not sure it applied to my case. Scrub is running now. Thank you very much! -Scott On 9/23/10 7:07 PM, David