Hi,
I was following the instructions in ZFS Troubleshooting Guide on how to
replace a disk in the root pool on x86 system. I'm using OpenIndiana, ZFS
pool v.28 with mirrored system rpool. The replacement disk is brand new.
root:~# zpool status
pool: rpool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more
Thank you all for the replies. I'll try the suggested solutions.
--
Peter
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Roberto Waltman li...@rwaltman.com wrote:
Cindy Swearingen wrote:
We don't yet have an easy way to clear a disk label, ...
dd if=/dev/zero of=... on the 1st and last 10% (roughly)
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Peter Wood wrote:
Running zpool iostat -v (attachment zpool-IOStat.png) shows 1,22K write
operations on the drives and 661 on the
ZIL. Compare to the other server (who is in way heavier use
Right on Tim. Thanks. I didn't know that. I'm sure it's documented
somewhere and I should have read it so double thanks for explaining it.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Peter Wood peterwood...@gmail.comwrote
Great points Jim. I have requested more information how the gallery share
is being used and any temporary data will be moved out of there.
About atime, it is set to on right now and I've considered to turn it off
but I wasn't sure if this will effect incremental zfs send/receive.
'zfs send -i
I'm using OpenIndiana 151a7, zpool v28, zfs v5.
When I bought my storage servers I intentionally left hdd slots available
so I can add another vdev when needed and delay immediate expenses.
After reading some posts on the mailing list I'm getting concerned about
degrading performance due to
at 5:46 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
On 02/21/2013 12:27 AM, Peter Wood wrote:
Will adding another vdev hurt the performance?
In general, the answer is: no. ZFS will try to balance writes to
top-level vdevs
I have two identical Supermicro boxes with 32GB ram. Hardware details at
the end of the message.
They were running OI 151.a.5 for months. The zpool configuration was one
storage zpool with 3 vdevs of 8 disks in RAIDZ2.
The OI installation is absolutely clean. Just next-next-next until done.
All
the Supermicro IPMI show anything when it crashes? Does anything
show up in event logs in the BIOS, or in system logs under OI?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Peter Wood peterwood...@gmail.comwrote:
I have two identical Supermicro boxes with 32GB ram. Hardware details at
the end of the message
dumps?
michael
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Peter Wood peterwood...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm sorry. I should have mentioned it that I can't find any errors in the
logs. The last entry in /var/adm/messages is that I removed the keyboard
after the last reboot and then it shows the new boot up
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the pointers. I'll definitely look into this.
--
Peter Blajev
IT Manager, TAAZ Inc.
Office: 858-597-0512 x125
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
On 2013-03-20 17:15, Peter Wood wrote:
I'm going to need some help with the crash dumps
image from
grub. Apologies in advance if I'm stating the obvious.
-- Trey
On Mar 20, 2013, at 11:34 AM, Peter Wood peterwood...@gmail.com wrote:
I have two identical Supermicro boxes with 32GB ram. Hardware details
at the end of the message.
They were running OI 151.a.5 for months
, 2013 at 08:50:40AM -0700, Peter Wood wrote:
I'm sorry. I should have mentioned it that I can't find any errors in
the
logs. The last entry in /var/adm/messages is that I removed the
keyboard
after the last reboot and then it shows the new boot up messages when
I boot
up
advice to make each crash as useful as possible.
Any pointers are appreciated.
Thanks,
-- Peter
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Peter Wood peterwood...@gmail.com wrote:
I have two identical Supermicro boxes with 32GB ram. Hardware details at
the end of the message.
They were running OI 151
14 matches
Mail list logo
