On 10/09/11 8:31 AM, LaoTsao wrote:
> imho, there is not harm to use & in both cmd
>
There is a difference.
--T
> Sent from my iPad
> Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D
>
> On Sep 10, 2011, at 4:59, Toby Thain wrote:
>
>> On 09/09/11 6:33 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
>>> Plus, you'll need an &
imho, there is not harm to use & in both cmd
Sent from my iPad
Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D
On Sep 10, 2011, at 4:59, Toby Thain wrote:
> On 09/09/11 6:33 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
>> Plus, you'll need an & character at the end of each command.
>>
>
> Only one of the commands needs to b
On 09/09/11 6:33 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> Plus, you'll need an & character at the end of each command.
>
Only one of the commands needs to be backgrounded.
--Toby
> -- Sriram
>
> On 9/9/11, Tomas Forsman wrote:
>> On 09 September, 2011 - cephas maposah sent me these 0,4K bytes:
>>
>>> i
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> Plus, you'll need an & character at the end of each command.
And a wait command, if you want the script to wait for the sends to
finish (which you should).
Nico
--
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
z
Plus, you'll need an & character at the end of each command.
-- Sriram
On 9/9/11, Tomas Forsman wrote:
> On 09 September, 2011 - cephas maposah sent me these 0,4K bytes:
>
>> i am trying to come up with a script that incorporates other scripts.
>>
>> eg
>> zfs send pool/filesystem1@100911 > /bac
On 09 September, 2011 - cephas maposah sent me these 0,4K bytes:
> i am trying to come up with a script that incorporates other scripts.
>
> eg
> zfs send pool/filesystem1@100911 > /backup/filesystem1.snap
> zfs send pool/filesystem2@100911 > /backup/filesystem2.snap
#!/bin/sh
zfs send pool/file