Hearing about others having problems with these cabinets makes me concerned
too.
Oh, well! I connected the cabinets to a different Mac (an older Mini with
USB 2 instead of 3), and the ZFS arrays now seem to be working. *holds
thumbs*
I am now going to set up a copy-job to see if that works
New day, new cables.
Now the computer recognizes the two ZFS arrays, but once again I cannot
read from or write to them.
Old array:
anderswallen:~ anderswa$ sudo zpool status -v
pool: array
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices are faulted in response to IO failures.
action:
Cool, getting somewhere. Can you give a quick rundown how things are connected
in your system and what cables are between various elements to provide a better
picture. What kind of controller for the drives, etc...?
Jason Belec
Sent from my It's an iPod, a Phone, and an Internet Device...
On
The arrays are housed in cabinets of this type
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005GYDMYG/ (one each).
Each cabinet is connected directly to a dedicated USB 3-port on the Mac
Mini. The Mini itself is a quad core i7, running the latest version of Mac
OS X.
I'm surprised that the cables failed
Yikes, did you say USB Oh I'm going to go back into my cave.
Jason Belec
Sent from my It's an iPod, a Phone, and an Internet Device...
On Nov 18, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Anders Wallén anders_wal...@mac.com wrote:
The arrays are housed in cabinets of this type (one each).
Each cabinet is
Addendum:
To add insult to injury, the computer now refuses to accept both my older
arrays (one ZFS Raid 6 and one HFS+ Raid 5).
The ZFS one doesn't even show up on sudo zpool list, and the HFS+ one
does not show up in App+le Disc Tools.
--
---
You received this message because you are
Yeah, expected this sooner, bad cable. Just went through almost exactly the
same sequence for a client. It was a SATA cable, but still getting issues after
replacing it and one drive that was seemingly bad. And then all drives
disappeared. Replaced the ESATA cable but is was also crap. Replaced