Am 05.03.2012 14:43, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
Can you please mention support for adding an option to disable
wiki-syntax parsing here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zim/+bug/585300
Ok, I have added a link to the new ticket
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zim/+bug/946229 where it is already
mentioned.
Am 04.03.2012 07:19, schrieb Ulf Bro:
The editor I use in everyday life is Vim (Vi). Here you switch
between modes all the time. But you do so without taking your fingers
off the keyboard. A similar edit mode in Zim would be no harm so
long as one could keep the mouse out of the business.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 00:49, Christoph Zwerschke c...@online.de wrote:
Am 03.03.2012 18:41, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
And why would casual users know this?
Well, to be honest I don't think zim is intended for casual users and
never will because it is not intended to be a wysiwyg editor. People
Am 04.03.2012 11:15, schrieb Christoph Zwerschke:
Agree. Except opening an external editor can be dangerous because then
you have two disconnected editing windows open for the same content, and
you can easily loose data when you save at the wrong time in the wrong
editor. Better to include a
Here are two issues to help improve the situation:
RFE: Edit source in Zim window
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zim/+bug/946224
Escape input when translating to Source
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zim/+bug/946229
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:15, Christoph Zwerschke c...@online.de wrote:
Am 04.03.2012 07:19, schrieb Ulf Bro:
The editor I use in everyday life is Vim (Vi). Here you switch
between modes all the time. But you do so without taking your fingers
off the keyboard. A similar edit mode in Zim would
Am 04.03.2012 11:17, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
Also, you might like to note that there is an Edit Source function in
the Tools menu. That is the place where one should be entering data in
raw format, not in the standard main window. A possible improvement
would be to have the Edit Source function
Am 04.03.2012 11:48, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
Then why do you prefer that you can type //some text// to have it
italicized in the normal window? What is wrong with Ctrl-I before and
after? It is exactly the confusion between raw/source mode and normal
mode that hinders Zim from handling arbitrary
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 13:07, Christoph Zwerschke c...@online.de wrote:
Also, it's not clear to me what you mean when you say that entered text
should be automatically escaped by zim. The problem is that if you enter
**bold** then you want your asterisks be interpreted by zim, not escaped,
but
Am 04.03.2012 16:59, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
The idea of entered text should be automatically escaped means that
**bold** will not be made bold. Rather, users who want to enter Wiki
syntax would do that in source / raw mode. Isn't that what **bold** is
(wiki source code)? Why does Source mode
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:29, Christoph Zwerschke c...@online.de wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 08:53, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
This bug has a real-life example:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zim/+bug/585300
Dotan, I think the problem is that what you are labeling a data loss issue
is no data loss issue at
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:17, Adam Porter a...@alphapapa.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 13:33, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
However, Zim is a bit unpolished in some key areas and I feel that
these paper cuts should be addressed before actively promoting the
application.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:38, hans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
Possibly, and I appreciate your telling me that. I don't see where I
have been forceful but I'm sure that you're right. I am certainly no
diplomat!
It's quite
Am 03.03.2012 18:41, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
And why would casual users know this?
Well, to be honest I don't think zim is intended for casual users and
never will because it is not intended to be a wysiwyg editor. People
who want that wysiwyg stlye should use applications like OneNote or
... The other special thing about zim is that edit
and view mode are not separated...
The fact that I don't need to switch between edit and view mode is
what makes zim so unique, and that paradigm really should be kept.
For instance, if you see a mistake or type on a page, you simply go
Am 02.03.2012 08:53, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
This bug has a real-life example:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zim/+bug/585300
Dotan, I think the problem is that what you are labeling a data loss
issue is no data loss issue at all. In your example, the data is
displayed without the **, because these
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
Possibly, and I appreciate your telling me that. I don't see where I
have been forceful but I'm sure that you're right. I am certainly no
diplomat!
It's quite possible to be fully honest and brutal about objective facts,
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
The dataloss and the fact that Zim cannot handle arbitrary text for input
are the reasons why Zim is unsuitable for use. The mislabel icon and
reappearing links are reasons why Zim seems only half-baked.
One of my many
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 03:29, hans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
The dataloss and the fact that Zim cannot handle arbitrary text for input
are the reasons why Zim is unsuitable for use. The mislabel icon and
reappearing links are
possibilities. So I was wondering that perhaps we can start to collect
all users' cases, that is a small description about how you use Zim
Wiki in your daily routine.
I agree with you. No problem. I can make a description any time.
Ulf
___
Mailing
One more issue that I should have mentioned that needs to be addressed
as it makes Zim seem as immature software:
Links come back after closing Zim
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zim/+bug/678250
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
21 matches
Mail list logo