[I think this is the only mailing list I'm on that doesn't do
Reply-To, so I always forget to Reply All.]
This is an interesting idea. I'm not sure if I'd like it. The @
signs are pretty common in other apps for marking some kind of
contextual info, like "context" in GTD apps. I actually wouldn
On 22 June 2012 13:45, Rudi Bruchez wrote:
> Sounds strange in a wysiwyg environment not to show smth the user typed.
> What happens then if believe I've forgotten the @ an type it again ? would
> it store @@tag ?
Well, there's lots of magic happening when typing markup in zim. The
magic usually
Sounds strange in a wysiwyg environment not to show smth the user typed.
What happens then if believe I've forgotten the @ an type it again ?
would it store @@tag ?
Personally I don't mind seeing the @ in front of my tags, at least in
zim. Dropping it in the HTML export could make sense, thoug
On 06/22/2012 05:51 AM, Jaap Karssenberg wrote:
So now my question: would it break the use case for tags if I drop the
"@" in the rendering ? So we would still use the "@" in the wiki
source, we would still use it for typing tags, but formatted tags are
highlighted by color instead of the "@" pr
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Joerg Desch wrote:
> One small remark about the tags view. Have you ever tried to view tagged
> calendar entries? You will see a list of 05's and 07's! Not really
> useful. It would be great if the list prints the whole path. If the
> string is to long, the path s
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:33 PM, NorfCran wrote:
> that sounds like a great proposal. Personally I may have a case, which uses
> tags for spatial identification for example "@location:lon,lat". The symbol
> of ":" is attached directly after the "@location". If this will be taken in
> consideratio
Hi Jaap.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:51:40 +0200
Jaap Karssenberg wrote:
> I was thinking a bit about why I don't really use tags myself. So I
> came up with the idea that I would want to use tags more like
> keywords.
I'm using Zim in 4 different main use cases but within one notebook. For
all of t
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Marco Cevoli wrote:
> It all depends on how you visualize the global index (tag cloud vs
> alphabetical index).
I don't think I want to change anything there. Should work exactly as
it works now.
The tag index version that is "sorted by tag" already looks more o
Hi Jaap,
This is not an easy question.
On one side we have tags, defined as "non hierarchical categories".
You can associate any page with 1 or more tags.
On the other side we have keywords (to be indexed). Do we want to keep
these 2 "categorization items" separated?
I use tags as "contexts", so
Dear all,
I was thinking a bit about why I don't really use tags myself. So I
came up with the idea that I would want to use tags more like
keywords. So instead of placing tags around a piece of text, I would
want to highlight certain words as key words that need to be indexed.
And I can do that w
10 matches
Mail list logo
