Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-26 Thread nomnex
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:10:10 +0100 > Jaap Karssenberg wrote: > > Did you check trash? If you pressed Delete at the wrong focus you may > have deleted from within zim without notice. If trash is supported > there is no deletion confirmation. (Although I have a TODO item to > bring that back if th

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-25 Thread jayseye
A true and funny observation, Vlastimil Ott. Unfortunately this case is different: The affected user _was_ fully backing up their work. In fact, this incident points up a *weakness* inherent in automatic syncing strategies. Version control is a loosely related, though completely separate technique

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-25 Thread Brendan Kidwell
I had to leave the office in a rush -- I'll send an "announcement" email later tonight. But just to let you all know if you're waiting for it, I compiled 0.59 for Windows and posted it in the usual place: http://www.glump.net/software/zim On Thursday, January 24, 2013, Jaap Karssenberg wrote: >

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-25 Thread Vlastimil Ott
Dne 25.1.2013 10:02, jayseye napsal(a): A very persuasive case for using version control, which I've been seriously considering anyway. There are two kinds of people... Those who back up their work and those who will. Sorry but it's true. I use Dropbox + online backup disk + external device

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-25 Thread Mark Hughes (Zim mailing list)
Has version control been tested on Windows? I have Git so just tried it out... It wasn't obvious from Configure whether I needed to do anything more but eventually I found the "More info" docs. So then I tried "File > Save Version?" This said version control was not yet enabled, so I confirme

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-25 Thread Jaap Karssenberg
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:02 AM, jayseye wrote: > Since Bazaar is already used for development, would that work about as > well as git, et. al, for this purpose as well? Sure, actually that was the first one supported by zim. Others have been added now. -- Jaap

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-25 Thread jayseye
On 1/25/13, Jaap Karssenberg wrote: > > (I always recommend to use the version control plugin, to allow > rollbacks.) A very persuasive case for using version control, which I've been seriously considering anyway. Since Bazaar is already used for development, would that work about as well as git

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-25 Thread Jaap Karssenberg
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:52 AM, nomnex wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:17:06 +0100 >> Jaap Karssenberg wrote: >> >> Yesterday evening I released a version 0.59 of zim. Trigger for the >> release was a critical bug that caused some content of the page to >> disappear for a specific combination o

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-24 Thread nomnex
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:17:06 +0100 > Jaap Karssenberg wrote: > > Yesterday evening I released a version 0.59 of zim. Trigger for the > release was a critical bug that caused some content of the page to > disappear for a specific combination of formatting. I have installed 0.59 after reading you

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-24 Thread Jaap Karssenberg
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:52 PM, HUGHES MARK wrote: > I did some greping for version numbers and did an "apt-get remove zim". > Here's what's left: > > /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/zim/__init__.py:__version__ = '0.58' > > How might this have got here? If it is in /usr/local/ it was not

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-24 Thread HUGHES MARK
I did some greping for version numbers and did an "apt-get remove zim". Here's what's left: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/zim/__init__.py:__version__ = '0.58' How might this have got here? What's the best way to get rid of it? Thanks, Mark On 24/01/2013 13:23, Mark Hughes (Zim mailin

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-24 Thread Hilmar
Correction - now sorted. Closed tray icon - did the trick. Shows new version. Thanks again for all your work Jaap! Hilmar On 24/01/2013 15:10, Hilmar wrote: I have the same occurring.  In the About box it still says v0.58,

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-24 Thread Hilmar
I have the same occurring.  In the About box it still says v0.58, but in the package list it says 0.59. Thanks Hilmar On 24/01/2013 13:23, Mark Hughes (Zim mailing list) wrote: I did the upgrade shortly after a reboot so there were no i

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-24 Thread Mark Hughes (Zim mailing list)
I did the upgrade shortly after a reboot so there were no instances running. Will investigate a bit more later. Thanks, Mark On 24/01/2013 11:15, Jaap Karssenberg wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Mark Hughes (Zim mailing list) wrote: This is the first time I upgraded Zim on Linux an

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-24 Thread Jaap Karssenberg
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Mark Hughes (Zim mailing list) wrote: > This is the first time I upgraded Zim on Linux and it still shows v0.58 not > v0.59 in the About box. > > I just ran "dpgk -i" on the download, which said there were errors (no > python-support) so I ran "apt-get install pyt

Re: [Zim-wiki] Zim version 0.59 released

2013-01-24 Thread Mark Hughes (Zim mailing list)
This is the first time I upgraded Zim on Linux and it still shows v0.58 not v0.59 in the About box. I just ran "dpgk -i" on the download, which said there were errors (no python-support) so I ran "apt-get install python-support" and re-did the "dpkg -i". The /usr/bin/zim file shows yesterday's