Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-30 Thread Jaap Karssenberg
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Thorsten Hackbarth thorsten.hackba...@gmx.de wrote: I experimented with replacing zim's Parsetree with docutils.document class. I think I would prefer not to replace the ParseTree structure (although it is due some refactoring). Main reason is that this

Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-29 Thread Thorsten Hackbarth
Hi, I experimented with replacing zim's Parsetree with docutils.document class. The docutils/reStructueredText approach looks quite promising: - the code looks well structured - and its documented - there are writers for different formats. (latex, odt,...) - positive side effect: parsers/writers

Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-28 Thread Ecaroh
Hi! Please excuse, my posting is a little bit longer. It has some thoughts about markup languages in general and the problems that rise around them if you have to import and export the data from various languages and file formats. If you interested in read more below.. Thoughts about

Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-28 Thread Rui Nibau
Hi Ecaroh, hi everybody. I don't understand the difference you make between ascii markups and wiki markups, what can be called Lightweight markup language (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweight_markup_language) ; for me, markdown is a wiki markup, as Dokuwiki syntax, pmwiki syntax, mediawiki

Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-28 Thread Juancarlo Añez
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Rui Nibau rui.ni...@omacronides.comwrote: - Giving Zim the ability to work with multiple wiki syntaxes - Enhancing the export fonctionality to be able to convert zim notebook pages in other wiki syntaxes As I understood it, Jaap said that the official Zim

Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-28 Thread Rui Nibau
Hi everybody. So, my first try was a complete mess ! Well, the new wiki syntax worked, but it was poorly integrated into Zim ! I changed a couple of things, and you can see how it goes now here : http://omacronides.com/media/videos/zim/zim-new-wiki-syntax-01.ogv - When you create a new

Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-24 Thread Jaap Karssenberg
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Rui Nibau rui.ni...@omacronides.com wrote: So Jaap, my question is : **how can i tell Zim to use my wiki format to read / write notebook files** ? Well, i understand how to do it, as my (local) branch of Zim now works with the new wiki syntax ; the real

Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-24 Thread Jaap Karssenberg
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Juancarlo Añez apal...@gmail.com wrote: If Jaap could refactor the code so Wiki parsers were pluggable and had a defined pluging API, some of us would be really happy. As I understand the current state of affairs, the  spec for the output of a wiki parser is

Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-24 Thread Svenn Are Bjerkem
From my experience, it seems that zim picks up files with .txt ending and includes them into the zim structure as if they were pages, regardless of header or not. I have put some asciidoc pages with the extension .txt in my zim, and they show up as pages, and since the syntax is not that

Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-24 Thread Jaap Karssenberg
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem svenn.bjer...@googlemail.com wrote: ... 8 ... Now I wonder what the motivation is to have additional markup language support in zim? Main argument is to use zim in combination with other software like an existing online wiki or existing

Re: [Zim-wiki] new wiki syntax: better way to implement in Zim ?

2011-01-23 Thread Juancarlo Añez
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Rui Nibau rui.ni...@omacronides.comwrote: I saw that maybe alternative syntaxes could be a new feature. So, if you ever think about this evolution, did you think of a way to do it ? Is my way a valid solution ? Or this feature should be managed in a plugin,