-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will have to say that I think JWR's email was woefully lacking in details
on the new baby...maybe it's a female thing, but...is this a grandson or a
granddaughter? What is the baby's name?
Heidi the fair
There was an original e-mail from JWR? Never saw it.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:10:16 GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will have to say that I think JWR's email was woefully lacking in
details
on the new baby...maybe it's a female thing, but...is this a
grandson or a
granddaughter? What is the baby's name?
Heidi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will have to say that I think JWR's email was woefully lacking in details
on the new baby...maybe it's a female thing, but...is this a grandson or a
granddaughter? What is the baby's name?
This new baby is my first grandchild. She is the firstborn of my second
Congratulations, John. Now I wish to address this continuing problem with
email regarding Topica. We've had it on other lists to which I was a
member for a short time. It always showed up with people who were using
Juno in that case instead of Outlook, Outlook Express or Eudora with an ISP
It's entirely possible, Stacy. However, I had the same trouble with Topica (with Zion
and with other lists) when I had my MSN account and my MStar account.
*jeep!
~~Chet
If ya thinks ya is right, ya deserfs credit - even if ya is wrong. Gus Segar via
Popeye
-- Stacy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wonder if it works best only with Outlook or Outlook Express? However, I
use Eudora, so that puts another thing in the mix.
Stacy.
At 04:47 PM 09/27/2003 +, you wrote:
It's entirely possible, Stacy. However, I had the same trouble with
Topica (with Zion and with other lists) when I
How does the lonely Mormon apologist, Paul Osborne, square with the fact
(based on evidence) that the prophet Joseph Smith incorrectly thought the
papyrus roll was genuine Abrahamic material when in fact it was not?
A fresh new perspective regarding this matter is now available for your
This is very interesting. It implies that God doesn't always correct error
for his purposes.
Stacy.
At 08:26 PM 09/27/2003 -0500, you wrote:
How does the lonely Mormon apologist, Paul Osborne, square with the fact
(based on evidence) that the prophet Joseph Smith incorrectly thought the
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:16:56 -0500 Stacy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
This is very interesting. It implies that God doesn't always correct
error
for his purposes.
Stacy.
Something like that. I had to come up with something for my website. I've
been deep into this stuff for a good
I don't remember. Are you on FAIR or affiliated with them?
Stacy.
At 09:21 PM 09/27/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:16:56 -0500 Stacy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
This is very interesting. It implies that God doesn't always correct
error
for his purposes.
Stacy.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:47:14 -0500 Stacy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I don't remember. Are you on FAIR or affiliated with them?
Stacy.
I got booted from FAIR but have since returned under the name of Truth
and they are allowing me too stay because I am being nicer and not
shoving
Stacy Smith wrote:
I wonder if it works best only with Outlook or Outlook Express?
However, I use Eudora, so that puts another thing in the mix.
===
Grampa Bill comments:
I use Mozilla. I always assume if I ain't read it, it's 'cause you
ain't sent it!
Love
Well, can you answer me another question which I am very curious
about? You know that many years ago the book and film THE GOD MAKERS was
aptly refuted by the book THE TRUTH ABOUT THE GOD MAKERS. I liked the way
in which this author did his refutation, even though I found fault with
some of
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:25:24 -0500 Stacy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Well, can you answer me another question which I am very curious
about?
I have not read either of the Godmaker books. I'm careful not to read to
much antiMormon material because it is depressing and does not edify at
Nothing yet. I only read chapter 1 and 2 of SHADOW OR REALITY and I wasn't
too impressed with their arguments but I admit it would have been difficult
to exactly write a response. Most of it sounded rather silly to me.
Stacy.
At 10:33 PM 09/27/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003
15 matches
Mail list logo