RE: [ZION] Feedback Please - Chapter 5

2004-03-05 Thread Sander J. Rabinowitz
Jonathan Scott wrote: Each year there are 1.3 million abortions in the US. There have been over 40 million abortions since Roe vs Wade in the US alone. Currently, 1 in every five pregnancies in the US results in abortion. America has a population of 291 million.

RE: [ZION] Federal Marriage Amendment

2004-03-05 Thread Gerald Smith
It means that no legal document can require marriage to also apply to same sex or other couplings. This doesn't disallow unions for them, just proscribes that the term and form of marriage be saved for man and woman. Gary Jonathan Scott wrote: Neither this Constitution or the constitution

RE: [ZION] Defend Marriage Petition, more information, installment 2

2004-03-05 Thread Rusty Taylor
I have not followed the issue in detail over the past years as you evidently have, so I am not very well informed. what I can tell you though, is that a reporters job is to make sure that the story can stand alone, , unless the srticle indicates it is part of a series. Proctors comments about the

[ZION] Steve Farrell on the Marriage Amendment

2004-03-05 Thread Steven Montgomery
Many of you know that Steve Farrell and I are best friends. Best friends or not, we are somewhat divided over whether or not an amendment is the best way to defend traditional marriages. While Steve is in favor of a Marriage Amendment, I am in favor or protecting traditional marriages by

[ZION] Martha Stewart Guilty

2004-03-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
Martha Stewart is guilty on all counts. // /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// /

RE: [ZION] Defend Marriage Petition, more information, installment 2

2004-03-05 Thread RB Scott
Bob: I'm sorry Bob, but Ms. Proctor's sweeping charges that the media deliberately buried the informing was just flat out wrong, as I pointed out in my response to her column. Ms. Proctor has been on a blame the media jag for quite some time. She ground this ax again. This time she got it

[ZION] Hatch's Proposal

2004-03-05 Thread Steven Montgomery
Take a look at Orrin Hatch's proposal for an amendment. Tell me what you think: http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/editors200403040830.asp -- Steven Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Editor, The Constitutional Banner Newsletter http://www.thecbn.net

Re: [ZION] Steve Farrell on the Marriage Amendment

2004-03-05 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 01:13 PM 3/5/2004, you wrote: Many of you know that Steve Farrell and I are best friends. Best friends or not, we are somewhat divided over whether or not an amendment is the best way to defend traditional marriages. While Steve is in favor of a Marriage Amendment, I am in favor or

[ZION] 34 U.S. Senators would nix Marriage Amendment

2004-03-05 Thread Steven Montgomery
According to Newsmax and unnamed published reports, at least 34 U.S. Senators would vote no on the Marriage Amendment: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/3/5/95800.shtml What stand a better chance is to limit the jurisdiction of Federal Courts--something that only takes a simple majority,

Re: [ZION] Testimony of Richard Richardson

2004-03-05 Thread Jonathan Scott
Yesterday the US Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Orrin Hatch held a hearing on the proposed federal marriage amendment. Here is the testimony of Richard Richardson before that committee: TESTIMONY OF REVEREND RICHARD RICHARDSON St. Paul African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Church The Black

[ZION] Cool Riddle

2004-03-05 Thread Jonathan Scott
Name something that is better than God, that dead people eat all of the time, and that if you eat it you will die? -- Jonathan Scott // /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// ///

Re: [ZION] Hatch's Proposal

2004-03-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
Steven Montgomery wrote: Take a look at Orrin Hatch's proposal for an amendment. Tell me what you think: http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/editors200403040830.asp I think that Hatch's proposal, if it became an amendment, would create a nation in which same-sex marriage was permitted in

Re: [ZION] 34 U.S. Senators would nix Marriage Amendment

2004-03-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
Steven Montgomery wrote: According to Newsmax and unnamed published reports, at least 34 U.S. Senators would vote no on the Marriage Amendment: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/3/5/95800.shtml What stand a better chance is to limit the jurisdiction of Federal Courts--something that only

[ZION] Third Party Candidates

2004-03-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
If President Bush actively promotes a federal marriage amendment, then I will vote for him in November. Otherwise, I will vote for a third party candidate. However, I know nothing about the various third party candidates. Does anyone here have information that might be valuable to me? Who

Re: [ZION] Help Me Please

2004-03-05 Thread Jonathan Scott
Hello, I'm working on chapter three, and I need some help. I'm compiling a list of all of the possible positive and negative things kids of the sixties would would have had to measure and consider when choosing whether or not (or how much) to abandon US culture...especially in light of the

Re: [ZION] Farrell, Hatch and Redelfs

2004-03-05 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 06:40 PM 3/5/2004, you wrote: Orrin Hatch feels that ONLY a federal marriage amendment will provide an effective barrier against judicial activism redefining marriage to include same-sex marriage. Apparently Steve Farrell agrees. So does Redelfs. Anything less than a federal amendment will

Re: [ZION] Farrell, Hatch and Redelfs

2004-03-05 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 07:32 PM 3/5/2004, you wrote: At 06:40 PM 3/5/2004, you wrote: Orrin Hatch feels that ONLY a federal marriage amendment will provide an effective barrier against judicial activism redefining marriage to include same-sex marriage. Apparently Steve Farrell agrees. So does Redelfs. Anything

RE: [ZION] Martha Stewart Guilty

2004-03-05 Thread RB Scott
Not true. The most serious ones were dropped a week or two ago. -Original Message- From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ZION] Martha Stewart Guilty Martha Stewart is guilty on all counts.