Jonathan Scott wrote:
Each year there are 1.3 million abortions in the US.
There have been over 40 million abortions since Roe vs Wade
in the US alone.
Currently, 1 in every five pregnancies in the US results in abortion.
America has a population of 291 million.
It means that no legal document can require marriage to also apply to
same sex or other couplings.
This doesn't disallow unions for them, just proscribes that the term and
form of marriage be saved for man and woman.
Gary
Jonathan Scott wrote:
Neither this Constitution or the constitution
I have not followed the issue in detail over the past years as you
evidently have, so I am not very well informed. what I can tell you though,
is that a reporters job is to make sure that the story can stand alone, ,
unless the srticle indicates it is part of a series. Proctors comments
about the
Many of you know that Steve Farrell and I are best friends. Best friends or
not, we are somewhat divided over whether or not an amendment is the best
way to defend traditional marriages. While Steve is in favor of a Marriage
Amendment, I am in favor or protecting traditional marriages by
Martha Stewart is guilty on all counts.
//
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
/
Bob:
I'm sorry Bob, but Ms. Proctor's sweeping charges that the media
deliberately buried the informing was just flat out wrong, as I
pointed out in my response to her column. Ms. Proctor has been on
a blame the media jag for quite some time. She ground this ax
again. This time she got it
Take a look at Orrin Hatch's proposal for an amendment. Tell me what you think:
http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/editors200403040830.asp
--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Editor, The Constitutional Banner Newsletter
http://www.thecbn.net
At 01:13 PM 3/5/2004, you wrote:
Many of you know that Steve Farrell and I are best friends. Best friends
or not, we are somewhat divided over whether or not an amendment is the
best way to defend traditional marriages. While Steve is in favor of a
Marriage Amendment, I am in favor or
According to Newsmax and unnamed published reports, at least 34 U.S.
Senators would vote no on the Marriage Amendment:
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/3/5/95800.shtml
What stand a better chance is to limit the jurisdiction of Federal
Courts--something that only takes a simple majority,
Yesterday the US Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Orrin Hatch
held a hearing on the proposed federal marriage amendment. Here is
the testimony of Richard Richardson before that committee:
TESTIMONY OF REVEREND RICHARD RICHARDSON
St. Paul African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Church
The Black
Name something that is better than God, that dead people eat
all of the time, and that if you eat it you will die?
--
Jonathan Scott
//
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
///
Steven Montgomery wrote:
Take a look at Orrin Hatch's proposal for an amendment. Tell me what you
think:
http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/editors200403040830.asp
I think that Hatch's proposal, if it became an amendment, would create a
nation in which same-sex marriage was permitted in
Steven Montgomery wrote:
According to Newsmax and unnamed published reports, at least 34 U.S.
Senators would vote no on the Marriage Amendment:
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/3/5/95800.shtml
What stand a better chance is to limit the jurisdiction of Federal
Courts--something that only
If President Bush actively promotes a federal marriage amendment, then I
will vote for him in November. Otherwise, I will vote for a third party
candidate. However, I know nothing about the various third party
candidates. Does anyone here have information that might be valuable to
me? Who
Hello,
I'm working on chapter three, and I need some help. I'm
compiling a list of all of the possible positive and negative things
kids of the sixties would would have had to measure and consider
when choosing whether or not (or how much) to abandon US
culture...especially in light of the
At 06:40 PM 3/5/2004, you wrote:
Orrin Hatch feels that ONLY a federal marriage amendment will provide an
effective barrier against judicial activism redefining marriage to include
same-sex marriage.
Apparently Steve Farrell agrees. So does Redelfs. Anything less than a
federal amendment will
At 07:32 PM 3/5/2004, you wrote:
At 06:40 PM 3/5/2004, you wrote:
Orrin Hatch feels that ONLY a federal marriage amendment will provide an
effective barrier against judicial activism redefining marriage to
include same-sex marriage.
Apparently Steve Farrell agrees. So does Redelfs. Anything
Not true. The most serious ones were dropped a week or two ago.
-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ZION] Martha Stewart Guilty
Martha Stewart is guilty on all counts.
18 matches
Mail list logo