Stephen Beecroft wrote:
-Marc-
And Jim never did admit he was wrong in his initial report.
Why should he? He wasn't wrong.
Yes he was. He claimed a politician made a public statement. She's not a
politician, and her comment was not public. The Toronto Star article he referred
to made
So who's keeping score? Who even remembers your challenge? (Well, now that
you mention it :-)
Noj
Marc A. Schindler wrote:
Perhaps, but I'm still hearing flak from USAmericans (perhaps not on this
list
anymore). And Jim never did admit he was wrong in his initial report.
Gary Smith
No one anymore. I think the story's blown over.
Jon Spencer wrote:
So who's keeping score? Who even remembers your challenge? (Well, now that
you mention it :-)
Noj
Marc A. Schindler wrote:
Perhaps, but I'm still hearing flak from USAmericans (perhaps not on this
list
anymore).
Marc,
You know, we USAmericans wouldn't worry so much about her as you suggest
we shouldn't, if you wouldn't keep worrying so much about her onthe list!
;-)
I'd almost forgotten about her today, until you brought her up again...
At least she has free medical care if she gets sacked...
K'aya
Perhaps, but I'm still hearing flak from USAmericans (perhaps not on this list
anymore). And Jim never did admit he was wrong in his initial report.
Gary Smith wrote:
Marc,
You know, we USAmericans wouldn't worry so much about her as you suggest
we shouldn't, if you wouldn't keep worrying so
For those interested in the internal party politics that led to Francie
Ducros' resignation (she was the communications aide who was overhead
referring to Bush as a moron) here's a link from today's Glock 'n'
Spiel:
