You're right. Them's the words they've been using, however: one
man +one woman = marriage.
-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
RB Scott wrote:
Huh
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
Here is an awesome article by Thomas Sowell on why Gay
marriage movement
is wrong.
Gary
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/ts20040309.shtml
'Gay marriage' confusions
?
Ron Scott
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
Marriage has shown itself to be a core ideal for
society's strength and
longevity. Society (read: government
.
RBS
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
Here is an awesome article by Thomas Sowell on why Gay
marriage movement
is wrong.
Gary
]
-
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
A key difference, though, is that homosexuality is a sexual
issue; whereas marriages between man
: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
A key difference, though, is that homosexuality is a
sexual issue;
whereas marriages between man and woman (or even polygamy) has
additional natural
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
Here is an awesome article by Thomas Sowell on why Gay
marriage movement
is wrong.
Gary
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/ts20040309.shtml
'Gay marriage' confusions
Thomas Sowell (archive)
March 9, 2004
Few
RB Scott wrote:
Then there are economic issues to be considered. For instance:
suppose two good friends, both widowed mothers of minor children
decided their chances for remarriage were nil. Yet, in the
interest of keeping their families out the poorhouse, to
eliminate the need to leave children
-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
RB Scott wrote:
Then there are economic issues to be considered. For instance:
suppose two good friends, both
RB Scott wrote:
Freaky? How would it be freaky for two old friends, both single
parents, to decide to pool resources? Why would it be freaky for,
say, two siblings, both single parents, to pool their resources,
reduce/consolidate their overhead costs as it were? Such has been
going on for years,
RB Scott wrote:
Does society derive benefits from encouraging people to form more stable
and more economically robust family units? The government says yes. So
does the church.
In the Proclamation on the Family the Church defines the family as a man
and woman. I don't believe the Church has
RB Scott wrote:
Then there are economic issues to be considered. For instance:
suppose two good friends, both widowed mothers of minor children
decided their chances for remarriage were nil. Yet, in the
interest of keeping their families out the poorhouse, to
eliminate the need to leave children
-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 5:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
RB Scott wrote:
Freaky? How would it be freaky for two old friends, both single
parents, to decide to pool
-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 5:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
RB Scott wrote:
Does society derive benefits from encouraging people
to form more stable
and more economically
I respect your opinion John, even though I disagree with it to
the extent that it would be practically impossible to come up
with a definition of traditional family that would pass muster.
For instance, I can no imagine that the church would exclude
single parent families (widowed and divorced)
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 7:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
I respect your opinion John, even though I disagree with it to
the extent that it would be practically impossible
Redefining things is exactly what this problem does not need. We have
arrived at the present situation because a very few vocal malcontents
decided that definitions that successfuly accomodated the cultural
interests of the civil majority for the past ten centuries now suddenly
don't cater
RB Scott wrote:
Huh? It defines marriage as a institution between one man and one
woman.
The wording hasn't even been agreed upon yet. You are getting ahead of
yourself. --JWR
//
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 7:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
I respect your opinion John, even though I disagree with it to
the extent that it would be practically impossible
McGee Doug R Contr OO-ALC/ITMS wrote:
Well, it might be OK in California
or New York but we're not having any of that crap in Alabama.
===
Grampa Bill comments:
That same little girl has stomped those spiders flat in Texas,
Georgia, and Alabama that
, 2004 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
Here is an awesome article by Thomas Sowell on why Gay
marriage movement
is wrong.
Gary
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/ts20040309.shtml
'Gay marriage' confusions
Thomas Sowell (archive)
March 9, 2004
Few
RB Scott wrote:
Some of us regard marriage as a religious blessing, a religious
covenant. Some us, therefore, think the government has no business
getting itself involved in a religious matter -- like determining what
constitutes a marriage.
If marriage is only a religious blessing, a
-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Gay marriage is wrong
RB Scott wrote:
Some of us regard marriage as a religious blessing, a
religious
covenant. Some us, therefore, think
23 matches
Mail list logo
