-
From: John W. Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: [ZION] heck ain't cussin
George Cobabe favored us with:
Marc - would it be true to say that we LDS believe in a universal
definition
of Godhood, and what is entailed
George Cobabe favored us with:
The problem is that the doctrine of the trinity is so convoluted we cannot
if discuss it without being subject to the same requirements of confusion
and misunderstanding.
Not much simpler is it?
I think I got it the second time around. Still, conceptually it is
- then does the false notion of trinitarianism have a basis
in truth, but then it is corrupted in its application?
George
- Original Message -
From: Marc A. Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]e Monday, December 16, 2002 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [ZION] heck ain't cussin
I'll give
The problem is there's a trap for the innocent here. I know what you mean, and
would agree with it. The problem is that Platonists would ascribe an *independent*
existence to a characteristic. Kind of like turning an adjective into a noun. So
God became an abstract and separate existence an und
, 2002 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: [ZION] heck ain't cussin
The problem is there's a trap for the innocent here. I know what you mean,
and
would agree with it. The problem is that Platonists would ascribe an
*independent*
existence to a characteristic. Kind of like turning an adjective into a
noun. So
God
Jon Spencer wrote:
I watched a very learned Lutheran schoolar explain this entire subject (the
Trinity) on TV once, and I felt inclined to write to the school that gave
him his doctor of divinity degree and advise them to retract it.
It was pure, illogical gibberish, with many hidden (and
George Cobabe favored us with:
Marc - would it be true to say that we LDS believe in a universal definition
of Godhood, and what is entailed in that high station, and see infinite
manifestations of that universal concept? What is God is a universal
constant that many, many are exalted to conform
I watched a very learned Lutheran schoolar explain this entire subject (the
Trinity) on TV once, and I felt inclined to write to the school that gave
him his doctor of divinity degree and advise them to retract it.
It was pure, illogical gibberish, with many hidden (and unproven)
assumptions. As
At 10:58 12/13/2002 -0500, St Jon wrote:
I watched a very learned Lutheran schoolar explain this entire subject (the
Trinity) on TV once, and I felt inclined to write to the school that gave
him his doctor of divinity degree and advise them to retract it.
It was pure, illogical gibberish, with
Stacy Smith wrote:
The way I understood the entire thing is that it would be like splitting
water into its various forms but with each being capable of reacting
separately, something water can't do.
Stacy.
So basic'ly, we're back at the malfunctioning transporter again. (See
the
Stacy Smith wrote:
I think that as a former Protestant I understood much about trinitarian
theology and understood what it meant. I had very few vague ideas about
the subject.
Could you explain it to me, then? In all my years in Southern Baptist,
and in all my wife's years in various
The way I understood the entire thing is that it would be like splitting
water into its various forms but with each being capable of reacting
separately, something water can't do.
Stacy.
At 03:46 PM 12/12/2002 +, you wrote:
Stacy Smith wrote:
I think that as a former Protestant I
Most people don't understand well the doctrines of their church. That
includes LDS members, though the active ones probably understand our
basic tenets better than those of other churches. Most Trinitarians do
not understand the Trinity well (most believe in modalism, a few even
believe in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
