http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/22/science/22JESU.html?ex=1036036800&en=53be1b8ad1e35dda&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
Here is a story in the New York Times reporting a discovery published in
Biblical Archaeology Review. Unless it is a fraud, it may be the earliest
reference to Jesus found so far. It is a stone box inscribed with the
words, "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus."
What do you think? Pretty awesome, huh?
John W. Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
If you were a poor Indian with no weapons, and a bunch
of conquistadors came up to you and asked where the
gold was, I don't think it would be a good idea to say, "I
swallowed it. So sue me." --Jack Handy
===
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR
/
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^
