Re: [ZION] Malice vs. Stupidity

2003-07-08 Thread Stacy Smith
The Book of Mormon bears this out well.  It was malice, not stupidity, 
although it could be argued that malice is stupidity itself also, that 
killed all the Nephites and led to their destruction.

Stacy.

At 12:00 PM 07/08/2003 -0800, you wrote:

I would like to examine an idea:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by 
stupidity."

Is this a true principle?  Is stupidity more characteristic of the human 
species than malice?  Just how unusual is malice?  Is it no more to be 
feared than stupidity?  Should malice always be ruled out without 
examination if by any stretch stupidity could be implicated?

I personally feel that malice is often the cause of that which we assume 
to be the result of stupidity.  Further, when outcomes are egregious, the 
stupidity required would be excessive considering the people 
involved.  Most people in top leadership positions are not stupid or else 
they would not be able to ascend to top leadership.  Malice, on the other 
hand, could actually help a person ascend to a position of top leadership 
so long as hypocrisy is sufficient.  How prevalent is the vice of hypocrisy?

The thought that stupidity explains most conspiracy theories is an 
attractive one.  It lets us relax and dismiss evil as unavoidable since 
stupidity has no easy cure.  But malice is something that we need to be 
aware of when it exists.  Malice is so dangerous it is a security 
problem.  It is something that needs to be armed against.  In my opinion, 
it is a great mistake, it is enormously foolish, to dismiss as stupidity 
that which is rightly attributed to malice.  It is especially foolish to 
ignore malice in a knee-jerk fashion without examination.  If the evil is 
the result of stupidity, fine.  But rule out malice before making that 
assumption.   Malice does exist in the world.  And where it exists, it 
needs to be dealt with.

Never attribute to stupidity that which is correctly attributed to malice.

John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
"There is no place in this work for those who believe only
in the gospel of doom and gloom.  The gospel is good
news.  It is a message of triumph." --Gordon B. Hinckley
===
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR
//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/






---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.489 / Virus Database: 288 - Release Date: 06/10/2003
//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^




[ZION] Malice vs. Stupidity

2003-07-08 Thread John W. Redelfs
I would like to examine an idea:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by 
stupidity."

Is this a true principle?  Is stupidity more characteristic of the human 
species than malice?  Just how unusual is malice?  Is it no more to be 
feared than stupidity?  Should malice always be ruled out without 
examination if by any stretch stupidity could be implicated?

I personally feel that malice is often the cause of that which we assume to 
be the result of stupidity.  Further, when outcomes are egregious, the 
stupidity required would be excessive considering the people 
involved.  Most people in top leadership positions are not stupid or else 
they would not be able to ascend to top leadership.  Malice, on the other 
hand, could actually help a person ascend to a position of top leadership 
so long as hypocrisy is sufficient.  How prevalent is the vice of hypocrisy?

The thought that stupidity explains most conspiracy theories is an 
attractive one.  It lets us relax and dismiss evil as unavoidable since 
stupidity has no easy cure.  But malice is something that we need to be 
aware of when it exists.  Malice is so dangerous it is a security 
problem.  It is something that needs to be armed against.  In my opinion, 
it is a great mistake, it is enormously foolish, to dismiss as stupidity 
that which is rightly attributed to malice.  It is especially foolish to 
ignore malice in a knee-jerk fashion without examination.  If the evil is 
the result of stupidity, fine.  But rule out malice before making that 
assumption.   Malice does exist in the world.  And where it exists, it 
needs to be dealt with.

Never attribute to stupidity that which is correctly attributed to malice.

John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
"There is no place in this work for those who believe only
in the gospel of doom and gloom.  The gospel is good
news.  It is a message of triumph." --Gordon B. Hinckley
===
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR 

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^