Re: Pakistan election (was Re: [ZION] War in Iraq)

2002-10-11 Thread Marc A. Schindler



"Marc A. Schindler" wrote:

> I was wrong for the right reason.

 That should of course have read "right for the wrong reason." My point was that 
the islamicists are gaining control of Pakistan's parliamentary system, that this will 
increase pressure on the military government, which will not relinquish power 
willingly, and when the cork does pop, the US will have another group of 65-odd 
million upset at it for propping up the military regime
in the first place. And they'll have the bomb, already tested.

> They look placed to control either main party's coalition. The regional government 
>they won is in the Northwest Frontier, too -- as in Khyber Pass and Peshawar. Voter 
>turnout has been very poor, as most Pakistanis realize the election is a sham 
>(contrary to what Bush's press spokesman seems to think). This will just increase the 
>pressure on the
> pressure cooker there.
>
> Mark Gregson wrote:
>
> >
> > -- Marc --
> > I said they'd win a majority of the seats set aside for general election, and that 
>they have done, both in regional and in the national parliament.
> >
> > -- Me --
> > How have they won a majority of the seats set aside for general election?  There 
>are 272 general seats.  60 are reserved for women and another 10 are reserved for 
>minority religious groups.  That leaves 202 general sets.  The fundamentalists have 
>apparently won 14 so far, of 40 reporting.  That is not a majority of all the seats 
>and is not a majority of the seats reporting so far.
> >
> > =  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =
> >
> >
> > --
> > __
> >
> > Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/
> >
> > Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/
> >
> > Powered by Outblaze
> >
> > /
> > ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> > ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> > /
> >
>
> --
> Marc A. Schindler
> Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
>
> "The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling 
>short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
> --Michelangelo Buonarroti
>
> Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author 
>solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor 
>those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
>
> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling 
short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author solely; 
its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor those of 
any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





Re: Pakistan election (was Re: [ZION] War in Iraq)

2002-10-11 Thread Marc A. Schindler

I was wrong for the right reason. They look placed to control either main party's 
coalition. The regional government they won is in the Northwest Frontier, too -- as in 
Khyber Pass and Peshawar. Voter turnout has been very poor, as most Pakistanis realize 
the election is a sham (contrary to what Bush's press spokesman seems to think). This 
will just increase the pressure on the
pressure cooker there.

Mark Gregson wrote:

>
> -- Marc --
> I said they'd win a majority of the seats set aside for general election, and that 
>they have done, both in regional and in the national parliament.
>
> -- Me --
> How have they won a majority of the seats set aside for general election?  There are 
>272 general seats.  60 are reserved for women and another 10 are reserved for 
>minority religious groups.  That leaves 202 general sets.  The fundamentalists have 
>apparently won 14 so far, of 40 reporting.  That is not a majority of all the seats 
>and is not a majority of the seats reporting so far.
>
> =  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =
>
>
> --
> __
>
> Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/
>
> Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling 
short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author solely; 
its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor those of 
any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





Re: Pakistan election (was Re: [ZION] War in Iraq)

2002-10-11 Thread Mark Gregson


-- Marc --
I said they'd win a majority of the seats set aside for general election, and that 
they have done, both in regional and in the national parliament.

-- Me --
How have they won a majority of the seats set aside for general election?  There are 
272 general seats.  60 are reserved for women and another 10 are reserved for minority 
religious groups.  That leaves 202 general sets.  The fundamentalists have apparently 
won 14 so far, of 40 reporting.  That is not a majority of all the seats and is not a 
majority of the seats reporting so far.

=  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =

   
-- 
__
Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/

Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/

Powered by Outblaze

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: Pakistan election (was Re: [ZION] War in Iraq)

2002-10-11 Thread Marc A. Schindler



Mark Gregson wrote:

>
> > The first of my "prognostications" has come true: Islamic
> > fundamentalists have won the Pakistani election:
>
> No, fundamentalists have not won the election.  Read the whole article and then read 
>some other news reports.  Fundamentalists have not won the election and will not 
>control the government.
>

I said they'd win a majority of the seats set aside for general election, and that 
they have done, both in regional and in the national parliament. But I also said it 
wouldn't make any difference
because Mussharaf is still the military dictator and has the power to dismiss the PM 
and parliament. This just increases the pressure on the situation, which was my point.

In any case, let's go through the article point by point:

1. "A coalition of pro-Taliban parties  won control of a provincial legislature near 
the Afghan border Friday, the first solid results from Pakistan's election. Vote 
counting for the national
parliament was moving slowly."  This is one of four regional parliaments which 
includes the Northwest Frontier, a Taliban stronghold.

2. "For the first time since a 1999 coup, Pakistanis voted Thursday in elections the 
military government hailed as a historic return to democratic rule and the opposition 
denounced as a
stage-managed sleight of hand to mask resident Gen. Pervez Musharraf's firm grip on 
power.." Both Pakistan and the US are portraying this as a transition to democracy. 
Some (and I'm one of them)
believe it will not lead in the short run to Musharraf's fall (although eventually it 
will, but some other things have to happen first).

3. "Musharraf - an important U.S. ally in the war on terrorism - has created a 
military-controlled National Security Council that will vet all national policy 
decisions. He has also granted himself
the  power to sack the prime minister and dissolve parliament, rendering the vote 
little more than window-dressing for continued military rule." As above.

4. I predicted that Islamic fundamentalists would gain control over the national 
parliament in Islamabad. I had in mind a majority of those seats available for it to 
run for. That hasn't quite
happened, but they are going to play a pivotal role, controlling whatever ruling 
coalition wins, so I think I'm right for the wrong reason (and in any case this 
represents an increase in
fundamentalist support): "The religious parties also were surprisingly strong in the 
National Assembly, Pakistan's lawmaking lower house of Parliament.  With returns 
trickling in, the religious
alliance looked like it could emerge as a key partner in any coalition government in 
the center."

5. The situation as of last night in Islamabad: "But vote counting for the National 
Assembly was slow and by early Friday only 40 of the 272 general seats in the federal 
Parliament were confirmed.
Of those, the religious alliance already  had 14 seats, including one in the federal 
capital of Islamabad."

I haven't even looked at the Globe this morning.


>
> My prediction: when vote counting is complete the fundamentalists will not have the 
>swing votes. (Not that it would matter if they did, since Musharraf has veto power 
>and dismissal power, too ).
>
> > When the military dictatorship there falls, we will be facing an Islamic
> > fundamentalist nuclear power.
>
> Why are you so sure that the dictatorship will fall?  It's in a semi-transitional 
>phase right now, so by definition it cannot actually fall.
>

I don't see it transitioning in the least.

>
> =  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =
>
>
> --
> __
>
> Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/
>
> Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling 
short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author solely; 
its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor those of 
any organization with which
the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an 

Pakistan election (was Re: [ZION] War in Iraq)

2002-10-11 Thread Mark Gregson


> The first of my "prognostications" has come true: Islamic
> fundamentalists have won the Pakistani election:

No, fundamentalists have not won the election.  Read the whole article and then read 
some other news reports.  Fundamentalists have not won the election and will not 
control the government.  

My prediction: when vote counting is complete the fundamentalists will not have the 
swing votes. (Not that it would matter if they did, since Musharraf has veto power and 
dismissal power, too ).

> When the military dictatorship there falls, we will be facing an Islamic
> fundamentalist nuclear power.

Why are you so sure that the dictatorship will fall?  It's in a semi-transitional 
phase right now, so by definition it cannot actually fall.  

=  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =

   
-- 
__
Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/

Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/

Powered by Outblaze

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^