Stephen Beecroft favored us with:
It's one thing to say that current racial classifications are imprecise,
or getting blurred, or not useful for this or that purpose. All such
proclamations may or may not be true. But to say that race doesn't exist
is to be tautologically incorrect -- people
At 14:45 12/17/2002 -0700, M Marc St Stephan wrote:
to play the fool.
Stephen
Play the fool is not a scientific concept either ;-)
Hey, wait, that's my part! You'se guys can't be stealing my part ...
Till who even got a new costume for the next show
Hey, wait, that's my part! You'se guys can't be stealing my part ...
Till who even got a new costume for the next show
In the spirit of Christmas, Till, I forgive you for tempting me to the utmost with
your provocative statements. That's a most humble forgiveness, too.
=
After all, it doesn't say the elect (like, say, a tall, young good-looking bishop)
*will* be deceived, it only says they *could* be.
Mark Gregson wrote:
Hey, wait, that's my part! You'se guys can't be stealing my part ...
Till who even got a new costume for the next show
In the
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
-Marc-
A new study of Brazilians confirms what biologists have always
known (but maybe not anthropologists?): namely, that there is
no genetic basis for determining race:
