After much pondering, Jim Cobabe favored us with:
It is a bit peculiar, Brother Fairbank, that you don't participate in
the revered social rituals of child support or alimony payments. These
blessings of our enlightened welfare state are as popular and common as
credit cards. Indeed, they consti
At 20:21 11/5/2002 +, Goodfriend Scott wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2002 15:01:45 -0500, "Elmer L. Fairbank"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> At 19:30 11/5/2002 +, Goodfriend Scott wrote:
> >On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 07:39:36 -0500, "Elmer L. Fairbank"
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> At 18:04 11/2/2002 +000
It is a bit peculiar, Brother Fairbank, that you don't participate in
the revered social rituals of child support or alimony payments. These
blessings of our enlightened welfare state are as popular and common as
credit cards. Indeed, they constitute a significant segment of the
Clinton lega
On Tue, 05 Nov 2002 15:01:45 -0500, "Elmer L. Fairbank"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> At 19:30 11/5/2002 +, Goodfriend Scott wrote:
> >On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 07:39:36 -0500, "Elmer L. Fairbank"
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> At 18:04 11/2/2002 +, Gib Mij wrote:
>>>
I'm always confused by th
-Attilla the Un-
> Am I a substandard American male?
Judging by the voluminous email spam I receive, I have concluded that I
am most certainly a substandard American male. The good news is that I
can be brought up to standard (so to speak) without painful weights or
operations. Alas, I haven't
At 19:30 11/5/2002 +, Goodfriend Scott wrote:
On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 07:39:36 -0500, "Elmer L. Fairbank"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> At 18:04 11/2/2002 +, Gib Mij wrote:
>
> >I'm always confused by this peculir application of the term "women's
> >rights". I'd kinda like to know exactly what
On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 07:39:36 -0500, "Elmer L. Fairbank"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> At 18:04 11/2/2002 +, Gib Mij wrote:
>
> >I'm always confused by this peculir application of the term "women's
> >rights". I'd kinda like to know exactly what constitutes the analogous
> >"men's rights".
>
>
At 18:04 11/2/2002 +, Gib Mij wrote:
I'm always confused by this peculir application of the term "women's
rights". I'd kinda like to know exactly what constitutes the analogous
"men's rights".
The right to work, pay taxes and die.
Till the helpful
///
Sounds like John needs to resurrection Zion-2.
Jim Cobabe wrote:
> News article reports that the is U.S. withdrawing support for the UN
> "Reproductive Health" agreement. The agreement was apparently largely a
> committment from the Clinton presidency for the US to fund "women's
> choice" clinic
