Hello,

Here is another free ZNet Update. You can add and remove addresses via
the link on the ZNet top page.


OF course there is much that is new up on ZNet since last message. For
example, there is the January issue of Z Magazine for sustainers and
online subscribers, and also two articles accessible to all, one by Noam
Chomsky on the Election and one by Eleanor Bader on Sex Education and
Bush.

There is also our usual steady flow of new articles, etc., but my
reasons for sending this ZNet Update are different and twofold. First we
have tonight's Sustainer Commentary which I would like you all to see,
from Andre Vltchek about conditions in Aceh. And second, as you know,
every so often a regular ZNet writer publishes a book and we send an
announcement of it in the form of a brief interview with the author.
This time the book is White Like Me: Reflections o Race from a
Privileged Son by Tim Wise. Both these essays follow below.



ACEH GOES TO HEAVEN! 
By Andre Vltchek

Resting in a comfortable seat of super-express speeding towards northern
Japan, I was admiring the snow-covered beauty of the rural countryside.
It was getting dark and the wheels of the train were gently drumming
against the rails in a monotonous and reassuring rhythm. The world
seemed harmonious and safe.

Then suddenly my eyes caught sight of the letters of a news bulletin
passing through the digital display above the door. Strong earthquake
shook northern Sumatra. There were dozens of casualties. Just that - no
further information was provided. I checked the news, one hour later, on
the internet in my hotel in Sendai. It seemed that hundreds of people
lost their lives in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India, and Thailand. An
earthquake off the coast of Aceh, reaching magnitude of 9 on the Richter
scale, was followed by a tsunami - a monstrous 10 meters high tidal wave
- which crashed mercilessly and with unimaginable force against the
shores of several unfortunate countries.

In the next few days the number of victims grew to thousands, then to
tens of thousands. Whole villages and entire towns disappeared from the
map. Hundreds of thousands of refugees hit what was left of the roads,
but the roads were leading nowhere; as bridges were washed away/ Floods
were fragmenting the entire North of Sumatra Island. Electricity and
water supply collapsed (limited and unreliable everywhere in Indonesia
even before the disaster); there was no food, no blood for the injured
and no medicine. There was no reliable information either, since the
foreign press was banned from traveling to the province, "for its own
safety".

The Army - a tremendous contingent of it based in the province in order
to suppress insurgency - did close to nothing. It was ordered to clean
corpses and it cleaned some, but it otherwise showed no initiative,
leaving a desperate population with almost no help.

The government did close to nothing. Instead of ordering special
military units to travel immediately to the province, instead of using
hundreds of military helicopters and aircraft to supply food and
medicine, instead of ordering all seaworthy vessels to the area of
disaster, the President of Indonesia urged the citizens to "scale down
New Year's celebrations and pray instead."

Huge transport planes were sitting on runways all over Java, waiting for
the order to take off - an order which never arrived.

Instead of employing professionals trained to cope with emergency
situations, vice president Jusuf Kalla used military planes and
commercial aircraft to shuttle Muslim militants (they called themselves
"volunteers") from Majelis Mujahedeen Indonesia and Islamic Defenders
Front (Front Pembela Muslim - better known as its acronym FPI - militant
Muslim group from Jakarta devoted to enforcing Islamic law against
drinking, gambling, and prostitution), a fact later reported by The New
York Times. Then Laskar Jihad, one of the most militant Muslim groups in
Southeast Asia made inroads into the province. Hundreds of Christians,
mainly of Chinese origin, were forced to flee Aceh.

The presence of "volunteers" - directly sponsored by the government -
had one main purpose: to secure Indonesian and religious order (already
the strictest in entire Indonesia) in the province which was fighting
for independence for almost thirty years, at enormous cost. Practically
speaking, these untrained urbanites were only taking precious space in
scarce flights to the province, although the propaganda machine fired
the stories how some of them single- handedly managed to restore
electric supplies and telecommunications in Banda Aceh.

And the dead kept mounting, diseases were spreading, hunger began to
kill those who miraculously survived the brutality of the nature.

At one point the refusal to help Aceh began to look like a vengeance
killing by the government and the military. Then Aceh suddenly appeared
in the spotlight of interest of the international community and after
some hesitation, the government "benevolently" allowed foreign aid and
some international press agencies to enter the province.

The results were almost immediate. International organizations and
foreign military flew in and began building infrastructure from scratch.
Not to rebuild it - there was not much social infrastructure even before
the tsunami - but to construct provisory hospitals, food supply centers,
shelters for the homeless. It was not enough, but it was at least
something; definitely more than the state did in the last three decades
when it came to investment in social infrastructure.

While this was happening, the Indonesian government was bragging that
the disaster would not jeopardize predicted economic growth for the year
2005 (the lowest in the region even before the tsunami).

The Finance Minister openly declared that it expects foreigners to
rebuild the area, while not diverting any substantial funds from state
coffers. He was also quick to point out that vital oil production (the
main reason for the occupation and the main income of the province -
basically controlled by foreign multi-nationals after corrupt deals
signed by Suharto's government few decades ago) suffered only a minor
setback, although some inside reports suggest the contrary.

The government also suggested that Aceh is an outskirt of Indonesia;
therefore its plight will have no major impact on the economy. In fact,
it argued with no scruples, Indonesia could benefit, because it may
attract thousands of tourists who will be avoiding damaged holiday
resorts in Thailand.

To put the situation into perspective, the social system in Indonesia
collapsed during the years when Suharto, supported by the West, fully
controlled the political and economic life of Indonesia. This was also a
period when Indonesians went through rigorous religious indoctrination
which was supposed to reinforce the culture of obedience, which in turn
served the regime.

Almost all public services were privatized, the quality of education
nose-dived and life expectancy stagnated at around 64 years (one of the
lowest in the region). Indonesia has, per capita, one of the highest
numbers of orphans anywhere in the world and one of the worst records of
child prostitution in the region. The poor have no safety net and
justice is for sale. Indonesia, according to "Transparency
International", is one of the most corrupt nations on earth.

The Indonesian military had been involved in a massacre of Sukarno's
supporters after the coup in 1965 (up to 3 million people were butchered
in a matter of months), it led genocidal war in East Timor (one of the
most horrific barbarities of the 20th Century, happily applauded by the
West), and caused gross human rights violations in Papua, Ambon, Aceh
and elsewhere. It was and still is much better trained in raping and
torturing civilians than in any sort of humanitarian assistance. 

This compassionless, paralyzed and morally corrupt society was now
facing one of the most terrible natural disasters in human history.
Government officials and their business associates smelled a tremendous
influx of foreign aid, which could, if unchecked, easily meet the same
fate as the money from former foreign loans originally intended for
development, infrastructure, and social programs but which disappeared
in the deep pockets of elites, never reaching the impoverished majority
of Indonesians.

As foreign governments were trying to outdo each other in pledging
hundreds of millions of dollars for reconstruction of disaster stricken
areas, Indonesian officials and military on the ground in Aceh were
openly sabotaging relief efforts.

Food and medicine were piling in Medan and Banda Aceh, while almost no
help was reaching desperate communities. A chartered Boeing 737 hit a
buffalo after landing, shutting down for hours the only runway in the
then only functioning airport in all of Aceh. Apparently it was not
worth it to assign the military to guard this vital lifeline. But was it
really an accident? 

"One of the consequences of the lack of distribution of aid and medical
assistance to several refugee camps has been the death of many refugees,
especially women and children", says Yulia Evina Bhara from SEGERA
(Alliance-Solidarity Movement For the People of Aceh). "This has
occurred in Mata Le, Ulee Kareng, and large part of Pidie and Aceh
Jeumpa... It is evident that the government has not taken any
cooperative steps in terms of allowing easy access to areas in which aid
needs to be distributed. If this continues to be the case, it means that
the government is effectively disregarding the much needed humanitarian
solidarity..."

Shortly after the tsunami hit the coast, GAM (Free Aceh Movement)
declared a ceasefire. Few days later there were reports that Indonesian
military continued with its operations. Sporadic exchanges of fire
erupted in several places of Aceh. With no shame and no hesitation, the
President of Indonesia began accusing GAM of breaking the ceasefire.

Foreign mainstream press (traditionally friendly to the post-1965
Indonesian regime), which initially concentrated its coverage strictly
on disaster itself and later on the foreign relief operations, began
asking some uncomfortable questions. Although still omitting information
concerning the horrific human rights record of the Indonesian state, it
couldn't fully ignore voices of Acehnese people who were accusing the
government of sabotaging relief operations.

Sharp criticism of Indonesian government and military also came from
foreign aid workers.

That seemed to be unacceptable for the establishment. On January 9th,
the government began tightening restrictions on the movement of
foreigners in the province. Reuters reported that on the 11th of January
all good will vanished. Indonesia restricted foreign aid workers to two
large cities because of "militant threats".

Indonesian army chief - General Endriartono Sutarto - declared that GAM
might soon attack foreign aid workers or troops in Aceh. All aid
agencies and NGOs operating in the province were urged to provide a full
list of their staff.

GAM responded by denying all accusations made by the government,
claiming that it never intended to cause harm to those who came to help,
be it foreigners or locals. Foreigners operating in Aceh confirmed that
they felt no threat from the independence movement.

A crackdown on independent sources of information by the Indonesian
state is becoming inevitable. As in East Timor, Papua, and Aceh (before
the disaster) it will be done under the cover of "protecting" the lives
of the foreigners. The question is what will happen to Acehnese people
afterwards. Even now, several members of Indonesian NGOs claim that the
government actions (or more precisely - inaction) are responsible for at
least 50 thousand out of 100 thousand known victims of disaster.

Is Aceh going to become another East Timor? Is the present situation
just a result of impotence and incapability of the government, military,
and the whole system, or of something much more sinister? Is it revenge;
an extermination campaign design to break and secure this economically
vital province?

Acehnese are proud and tough people. When Javanese elites were selling
their country to foreigners, when most of the islands of today's
Indonesia were accepting the presence of Dutch colonizers; Aceh fought
bitterly for independence. "Under the Dutch, Java used to send assassins
to break Aceh", said Pramoedya Ananta Toer, the greatest Indonesian
writer and intellectual father of Indonesian state. "We have so much to
learn from them!"

Recently, exploited by foreign multinational companies and by new
Javanese elites, the people of Aceh began to fight again, against all
odds. This time they fought against the Indonesian state - against one
of the largest military forces on earth. 10 thousand men, women and
children died in almost three decades of the conflict; maybe many more.

One of "profound" religious interpretations of this disaster in
Indonesia was that God punished the people of Aceh for fighting for
their independence. Official media even managed to find some Acehnese
who declared it on the record. "If we don't stop fighting, we'll all go
to hell."

Those who always suspected that there are no eternal flames, those who
respect human life above anything else always knew that Aceh was already
going through hell for many years. But "hell is the others" - those who
fight innocent civilians, those who torture, those who are blocking help
from the suffering people in their moment of tremendous need and
catastrophe.

If those who are using disaster and human suffering for their own
political, economic and military goals are not stopped soon, the entire
country of Indonesia may soon go to hell. Not to some hell depicted by
religious books - but to a real hell which is life in a society which
has lost all basic moral human values; which allows small minority of
people vulgarly lavish lifestyles at the expense of tens of millions who
are starving and desperate.

Aceh is bleeding and the worst may still be ahead. Those who are
arriving in Aceh should know that they are not only entering a land
devastated by horrific natural disaster; they are entering a territory
which was brutalized and exploited for decades and which still is. It
doesn't only need aid - it needs solidarity, protection, and determined
long-term help; and it needs it now! It needs a referendum and if it
decides to vote for it - freedom. Anything will be better than the
present situation - from here Aceh can only go to heaven!

ANDRE VLTCHEK, writer, political analyst and filmmaker lives and works
in Southeast Asia and South Pacific and can be reached at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  

White Like Me: Reflections on Race from a Privileged Son (Brooklyn, NY:
Soft Skull, 2005)

1.Can you tell ZNet, please, what your book, White Like Me: Reflections
on Race from a Privileged Son, is about? What is it trying to
communicate?

White Like Me is an examination of what it means to be white,
particularly, though not solely in the United States, using personal
stories as opposed to statistics and heavy academic analysis to look at
the issue of racism in this country.

It's sort of a memoir really, which explores six major themes: first,
the way that whiteness confers a legacy of advantage built up over
generations; secondly, the way that being white still today pays
dividends, in the justice system, housing, education and elsewhere;
third, the idea that whites can choose to resist racism and privilege,
but doing so takes practice; fourth, that even progressive whites often
inadvertently collaborate with racist structures, and that we have to be
mindful of how easy it is to do so, so as to be on guard against
perpetuating injustice; fifth, that racial privilege, while benefiting
whites in relative terms, actually makes most whites worse off in
absolute terms: culturally, materially, and in other ways; and finally,
that in struggling for justice alongside people of color, whites can
begin to regain a part of our humanity compromised by unjust social
systems.

I'm hoping to communicate that whiteness bestows advantage as well as
responsibility for addressing those privileges, both individually and
collectively. The purpose is not to feel guilty but to recognize the way
in which our racial elevation in this society has really weakened the
social support structures and systems of mutuality upon which we all
depend.


2. Can you tell ZNet something about writing the book? Where does the
content come from? What went into making the book what it is?

Writing the book was a very personal experience, since so much of the
material came directly from my own life history. For many years I'd been
wanting to do a book on racism that would make all the same points I
always try and make about the topic in my speeches or columns, but that
would do so without statistics and overly academic analysis. I really
wanted to tell stories to illustrate how whiteness works, because I
think lots of people respond more strongly to that kind of approach.

The inspiration, most directly, came from thinking back to high school,
when I, like lots of other white folks in this country were asked to
read John Howard Griffin's classic book, Black Like Me. As you may
recall, it's a book written by a white journalist, who traveled through
the Jim Crow South in 1959, after taking Psorlen--a drug that turns your
skin dark. Griffin wrote about what it meant to be black, after
"becoming black" for one summer.

While Black Like Me was interesting and valuable, especially for the
time in which it was written, I always found it interesting that, in
effect, teachers who still assign it, are only asking white students to
think about race from the perspective of what it means to be something
they aren't--black--when in fact, whites have plenty of experience with
race, as whites.

In fact, I think that for whites, if we would get clear on what it means
to be exactly what we are in this culture, we'd have a much better
understanding of racism, and what it means to be anything but
white--much more so in fact that from simply reading about the black
experience, Latino, Asian or indigenous experience, though of course we
must do that too.


3. What are your hopes for White Like Me? What do you hope it will
contribute or achieve politically?

I hope it will spark conversation, even argument, about the ongoing role
of race in the U.S. (and elsewhere for that matter), and get people
thinking about a subject that is extremely difficult for whites in
particular to discuss. I hope it can provide a spark for other white
readers, in particular, to examine their own lives, privileges, and
commitment to resisting injustice, and get them thinking about ways they
might work to become better allies to the people of color already
involved in fighting racism as a matter of survival.

I think antiracist activism is less likely if people don't make a
personal connection between their own lives and the large institutional
structures around them, so by trying to bridge the personal and
political in my book--by putting my own stuff in the street as the
saying goes--I'm hopeful that others will make similar connections and
renew their commitment to equality, or find a new commitment they had
never acted on before.

Finally, I'm hoping that the book can influence that part of the white
liberal/left that has long downplayed the role of racism in society, or
viewed it merely as a residue of the class system, instead of seeing it
for the unique, though certainly related, oppression that it is. Oh, and
I hope it will get folks thinking about other privilege systems too and
how they operate and overlap: class, gender, sexual orientation,
religion, ability/disability status, all of them.

 


===================================This message has been brought to you by ZNet 
(http://www.zmag.org). Visit our site for subscription options.

Reply via email to