Dieter Maurer wrote:
Tim Peters wrote at 2005-8-26 14:59 -0400:
...
I would like to make it an error (raise a ValueError exception) to attempt
to set obj._p_changed to a true value when obj is a ghost. Does anyone
object?
I came along an argument against this change:
Assume, you have a
Tim Peters wrote at 2005-8-26 14:59 -0400:
...
I would like to make it an error (raise a ValueError exception) to attempt
to set obj._p_changed to a true value when obj is a ghost. Does anyone
object?
I came along an argument against this change:
Assume, you have a persistent object o with a
Tim Peters wrote at 2005-8-26 14:59 -0400:
...
Doing
obj._p_changed = True
when obj is a ghost appears to be senseless (what could a user possibly
intend by doing this?)
I met this strange behaviour and considered it a bug.
What I wanted to do: use a ZODB object to synchronize
