Atmasamarpan Novy wrote at 2007-3-28 11:02 +0200:
> ...
>Problem:
>Current ZODB design creates a separate cache for each ZODB connection
>(ie. a thread in zope). It means that the same object could be
>replicated in each connection cache. We cannot do much about it since we
>do not know in advan
Atmasamarpan Novy wrote:
A current ZODB cache will become a first level cache (L1), each ZODB
connection maintains its own copy. When an object is needed it reads it
from L2 cache instead from a storage. L2 cache is a common for all ZODB
connections. Objects are stored there in the state where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Mar 2007, at 11:02, Atmasamarpan Novy wrote:
Two level cache:
A current ZODB cache will become a first level cache (L1), each
ZODB connection maintains its own copy. When an object is needed it
reads it from L2 cache instead from a storage
Hi,
I certainly do not know much about ZODB internals, therefore I do not
know if this idea make much sense. But it has been bothering me for some
time.
Problem:
Current ZODB design creates a separate cache for each ZODB connection
(ie. a thread in zope). It means that the same object could
