RE: [ZODB-Dev] Generational Caching

2005-06-08 Thread Tim Peters
[Dieter Maurer] > But with 32 bit addresses, a single process cannot use more than 4GB RAM. I expect that BIOS and/or OS often don't even allow that (e.g., user-space VM addresses are limited to 31 bits in Win32). I started working on 64-bit machines in the late 70's, so it's hard to believe that

RE: [ZODB-Dev] Generational Caching

2005-06-08 Thread Tim Peters
[Dylan Jay] > ... > Like generational garbage collection, which is I guess is one way to take > into account of frequency of use. When an object is used more than X > times it jumps to the next generation. In the next generation it is > checked less often making it more efficient than just checking

RE: [ZODB-Dev] Generational Caching

2005-06-08 Thread Dieter Maurer
Tim Peters wrote at 2005-6-7 23:05 -0400: > ... >Buying more RAM is an idea that just never gets old . But with 32 bit addresses, a single process cannot use more than 4GB RAM. -- Dieter ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://w

[ZODB-Dev] Re: ZCatalog for standalone ZODB use

2005-06-08 Thread Michael Twomey
I registered and logged in, the ZCatalog-1.0a0.tar.gz appeared as an attachment at the bottom of the page then. cheers, Michael DJL wrote: Hi Kevin! It looks very interesting stuff but where is your dist location (I can not find your dist for tests) best regards, Djebran _

Re: [ZODB-Dev] ZCatalog for standalone ZODB use

2005-06-08 Thread DJL
Hi Kevin! It looks very interesting stuff but where is your dist location (I can not find your dist for tests) best regards, Djebran Kevin Dangoor wrote: As alluded to in earlier messages, I've put together a packaging of ZCatalog (from Zope 3.1) for use with standalone ZODB. I'm calling th