Dieter Maurer wrote:
Why do you think so?
Almost everything is run off SANs. Why should "Data.fs" make a problem?
Under high load, an awful lot of data is read from this file.
SANs have higher latency than local disks. In some apps this can make a
noticeable performance difference.
cheers,
Patrick Gerken wrote:
You run your live Data.fs off a SAN?
That usually makes for interesting performance problems in the best case!
Well, yes, that is/was the idea when suddenly HA requests popped up.
You might be right,
Painful experience has taught me that I am ;-)
need to access many man
