For example, my computer have 1 GB RAM, could i have 2 GB objects loaded in
ZODB memory? I don´t well understand what is the cache in ZODB compared to the
RAM.
don´t De: Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com
Objet: Re: [ZODB-Dev] difference between RAM and cache in ZODB
À: elsand...@yahoo.fr
Cc:
2009/3/31 Sandra elsand...@yahoo.fr
For example, my computer have 1 GB RAM, could i have 2 GB objects loaded in
ZODB memory? I don´t well understand what is the cache in ZODB compared to
the RAM.
A ZODB client has an in-memory cache in RAM, and an optional on-disk
cache. The server stores
OK thanks. To confirm you can have a cluster of Zope instances all using
relstorage to connect to the same database. This negates the need for ZEO as
the database handles the multi-threaded data access.
+-+ +-+
|Zope Server 1| |Zope Server 2|
+-+
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:29:07AM +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
2009/3/31 Sandra elsand...@yahoo.fr
For example, my computer have 1 GB RAM, could i have 2 GB objects loaded in
ZODB memory? I don´t well understand what is the cache in ZODB compared to
the RAM.
A ZODB client has an
Anthony Gerrard wrote:
The Relstorage pypi site recommends against using version 5.1.23 of
MySQL because of major bugs. As it doesn't state explicitly what
these bugs are I can't tell whether they're fixed in the latest
version (5.1.32). Does anyone know whether it's safe to use this
latest
