Hi Jim, Malthe,
thanks a lot for your advice, really appreciated. I think I get what you
mean, but will read up a bit to fully understand whats going on, and to
write accordingly (I need the best read throughput I can get, and don't
need to bother much with the writes).
Cheers,
Joerg
_
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Joerg Baach wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> I was trying to measure the impact of using different kind of objects to
> store data in ZODB (disk, ram, time).
>
> Whats really ackward is the measurement for reading content from
> PersistentLists (that are stored in an IOBTree):
>
On 13 August 2013 15:40, Joerg Baach wrote:
> So, can it really be that using a PersistentList is 300 times slower? Am
> I doing something completely wrong, or am I missing something?
In your test setup, you commit the transaction and close the
connection. This means that when you iterate through
Hi *,
I was trying to measure the impact of using different kind of objects to
store data in ZODB (disk, ram, time).
Whats really ackward is the measurement for reading content from
PersistentLists (that are stored in an IOBTree):
case a
==
g.edges=IOBTree()
for j in range(1,100):
ed
