On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Christian Tismer tis...@stackless.com wrote:
Third rant, dear Zope-Friends (and I mean it as friends!).
In an attempt to make the ZODB a small, independant package, ZODB
has been split into many modules.
Maybe not as many as you think:
persistent,
On 22.07.13 13:13, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Christian Tismer tis...@stackless.com wrote:
Third rant, dear Zope-Friends (and I mean it as friends!).
In an attempt to make the ZODB a small, independant package, ZODB
has been split into many modules.
Maybe not as many
On Monday, July 22, 2013 02:11:04 PM Christian Tismer wrote:
BTrees would make more sense as a standalone package if the persistence
model were pluggable. But that is also theoretical because I don't see
right now how to split that further with all the C code.
I agree with this sentiment. When
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Christian Tismer tis...@stackless.com wrote:
On 22.07.13 13:13, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Christian Tismer tis...@stackless.com
wrote:
Third rant, dear Zope-Friends (and I mean it as friends!).
In an attempt to make the ZODB a
