Jim Fulton wrote:
Tim and I have discussed this for some time. We think an
asynchronous I/O approach is still appropriate, to handle
asynchronous messages from servers to clients, but we need
to get away from expecting a server to provide the asyncore
main loop needed by ZEO. Rather, ZEO should
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Tim and I have discussed this for some time. We think an
asynchronous I/O approach is still appropriate, to handle
asynchronous messages from servers to clients, but we need
to get away from expecting a server to provide the asyncore
main loop needed by
Here is a draft of a note I plan to send to the zodb list soon:
The ZEO client storage currently relies on a host application to
provide an ayncore main loop. This causes two major headaches:
1. The ZEO client storage has to have two modes of operation,
depending on whether the host
