RE: [ZODB-Dev] Re: setdefault branch

2005-08-30 Thread Tim Peters
[Ruslan Spivak] > Really, that usage of calling setdefault without explicit default is > confusing and useless IMHO too. I just wanted to think about possible > solution if someone ever could think about usefulness of setdefault > without default, but definitely in that case > {float,int,object}val

RE: [ZODB-Dev] Re: setdefault branch

2005-08-29 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim Peters] >> I'm trying to straighten out the new BTree.setdefault() code, on >> ZODB/branches/alienoid-btrees_setdefault. >> >> Turns out this can't work like Python's dict.setdefault() in all cases. >> This is why: >> >> >>> d = {} >> >>> d.setdefault(666) >> >>> d >> {666: None} [Ruslan Spiv

RE: [ZODB-Dev] Re: setdefault branch

2005-08-29 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim] >> ... >> Nothing else to do, so in the absence of objections I'll merge this to >> ZODB trunk tomorrow. [Ruslan] > Oh, you already did that, cool! Thanks, no objections from my side :) In that case, none from my side either ;-) ___ For more info