Hello Dieter,
Do you think that's possible?
Any ideas or tips?
Monday, August 14, 2006, 7:09:51 PM, you wrote:
> Chris S wrote at 2006-8-14 11:06 -0400:
>>When commiting a transaction, is there any way to track the progress
>>of data commited?
> No, nobody has yet envisaged this use case...
>>
--On 16. August 2006 10:52:51 +0200 Adam Groszer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Dieter,
Do you think that's possible?
This is not the question. With some effort you can develop almost
everything...you just have to find a volunteer and a budget :-)
-aj
pgpsTnNtwrvDx.pgp
Description: PGP
Hello Andreas,
Yep, you're right :-)
Are there any hooks in ZODB to support that or that should be a major
overhaul?
Wednesday, August 16, 2006, 11:03:54 AM, you wrote:
> --On 16. August 2006 10:52:51 +0200 Adam Groszer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello Dieter,
>>
>> Do you think that's poss
On Aug 16, 2006, at 5:13 AM, Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello Andreas,
Yep, you're right :-)
Are there any hooks in ZODB to support that or that should be a major
overhaul?
There are no hooks. It would probably not be a major overhaul,
however, it would probably require changes at multiple layer
On Aug 15, 2006, at 2:32 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:35 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Sorry to take so long to get to this
Jim Fulton wrote at 2006-6-12 06:34 -0400:
...
The potential inconsistency occurs because the ZODB (Connection)
cache
may contain objects not in the
Hello Jim,
For my small GUI app it happens that commit time is around 10-30
seconds depending on the object count&size. But until now it is not
worth doing big changes in ZODB. I can put a fake progress indicator
anytime that advances every second a bit and never reaches 100%.
Wednesday, August 1
