>> I was just reviewing what is pending for ZODB 3.9.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/3.9/+bugs
>>
>> Looks like all of the bugs listed for 3.9 are fixed or fixes are known
>> and pending.
>> Is a ZODB 3.9 beta around the corner?
>>
>> According to changes.txt the first alpha of 3.9 was cut almo
On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Alan Runyan wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was just reviewing what is pending for ZODB 3.9.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/3.9/+bugs
>
> Looks like all of the bugs listed for 3.9 are fixed or fixes are known
> and pending.
> Is a ZODB 3.9 beta around the corner?
Yes, for some
On Apr 7, 2009, at 6:05 PM, Alan Runyan wrote:
>>> I was just reviewing what is pending for ZODB 3.9.
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/3.9/+bugs
>>>
>>> Looks like all of the bugs listed for 3.9 are fixed or fixes are
>>> known
>>> and pending.
>>> Is a ZODB 3.9 beta around the corner?
>>>
>
Alan Runyan wrote:
> Is a ZODB 3.9 beta around the corner?
Just be aware that ZODB 3.9 is not compatible with any stable Zope 2.x
release. It only works and is required for Zope 2.12. It can be made to
work with prior versions of Zope2 but that is a mild pain.
Hanno
_
The tests were from ZODB trunk + Python 2.6 64bit on Windows.
We could setup buildbot's for ZODB on Windows. One problem is..
it takes ages for it the tests to run; so it would need to be on its
own VM.
I think we could run the tests nightly.. where would you want the output?
cheers
alan
p.s.
