I've been working on a project to speed up ZEO. The speedup mainly
involves getting ZEO to use more threads by giving each client it's
own thread, and changing FileStorage to allow multiple simultaneous
readers. This is especially valuable for us (ZC) for large databases
(~1TB) running on multi-s
Very interesting. I wonder how the postgresql version fairs?
Ross
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:08:07PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> I've been working on a project to speed up ZEO. The speedup mainly
> involves getting ZEO to use more threads by giving each client it's
> own thread, and changing Fil
Shane's earlier benchmarks show MySQL to be the fastest RelStorage backend:
http://shane.willowrise.com/archives/relstorage-10-and-measurements/
Laurence
2009/10/13 Ross J. Reedstrom :
> Very interesting. I wonder how the postgresql version fairs?
>
> Ross
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:08:07PM
Jim Fulton wrote:
> These benchmarks make ZEO+FS look pretty good relative to
> MySQLAdapter. The overall performance assuming even moderate;y
> effective ZEO pr object caches is significantly better for ZEO.
This is an excellent analysis. It pointed out some rough edges in
RelStorage performan
Laurence Rowe wrote:
> Shane's earlier benchmarks show MySQL to be the fastest RelStorage backend:
> http://shane.willowrise.com/archives/relstorage-10-and-measurements/
Yep, despite my efforts to put PostgreSQL on top. :-) It seems that
PostgreSQL has more predictable performance and behavior,
